To: Fredman who wrote (10317 ) 1/18/1999 3:22:00 AM From: PartyTime Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 15313
OFF TOPIC: FNTNers, one last post, and then I promise I'll fade away. Fred, below, is not all you said. >>>wait a sec - all i said was 'the boat left the dock on ZULUD'. If you want to read into it i was a naysayer, then so be it.<<< You also, in a separate post: >>>as a matter of fact, i do. see ZULUD, or ZULU, or NETZ, or whatever the name of that company is THIS week...... If they don't have to report it, why would they ????<<< Now, I have vivid recollections of you on the Zulu thread, in literal yap form, parroting [paraphrased]: Where's the report? Where's the audit? Where's the report? Sure, it took a while for Zulu to produce it. But it did. And it got submitted to the SEC. And they've also managed to meld seven companies into one during the process of trying to produce the report. In fact, the combination of ZULU and ESVS has reported since early last fall, and ESVS itself for nearly 10 years. So why today, er, yesterday, did you paint Zulu as unreporting; never mind your insulting name-game? You know what? I don't think you really know what's going on with Zulu. You've taken a one-side view from long ago and run with it all over the place. Is this the only thread where you use Zulu as your whipping boy? I guess I'm reminding you the next time you loosely bandy a name about, just remember there are some innocent investors who might well be supporting the stock you'd so recklessly shove to the side, as if you were an ill-mannered pedestrian nudging flesh on a crowded walk. And guess what? Some of us may well care about what you say. It took me two minutes of reviewing this thread to find your remarks--what else you got stashed back there? So perhaps an apology to Zulu longs as well would seem appropriate.