Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Discuss Year 2000 Issues -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (3330)	1/18/1999 1:42:00 PM
From: jwk	Respond to of 9818

Ron -- well said. very, very, well said.

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (3330)	1/18/1999 2:20:00 PM
From: david sosiak	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9818

Dear Ron, Great post!! Very thought provoking !!!!! Regards, Dave

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (3330)	1/18/1999 5:28:00 PM
From: TEDennis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9818

Ron: Say what? You really don't know what you're talking about, do you? < .... pause .... > Ha! Just kidding. Didn't want you to get an over-inflated ego by being told by everybody what a terrific post that was. Which I happen to agree with, by the way. TED

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (3330)	1/18/1999 7:34:00 PM
From: Cheeky Kid	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 9818

How do you accurately determine what the recession was caused by? Is it Y2K or just a natural cycle or something else. What caused the crash and depression in the 30's? escape.com Predictions are just that, PREDICTIONS. If a recession happens, it obvious businesses go under, but maybe the recession was a normal recession we experience every decade or two. Is there an economist that can accurately predict anything consistently?