Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ALYA Cost cutting system via software as well as security -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Essam Hamza who wrote (2218)	1/20/1999 12:32:00 AM
From: SteveHC	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2534

Some Insights: Awhile back I posted that I'd emailed to Dale P. re: stock's concerns but did not receive reply. Finally got one; see below for copy & draw your own conclusions (I no longer hold a position on this stock, but figured I'd post Dale's response for the benefit of y'all seeing as he finally sent me one!). Date: Tuesday, January 19, 1999 2:37:07 AM From: Dale_Paruk@bc.sympatico.ca Subj: Re: Re: Stock sinking to all-time lows... To: SteveHC1@aol.com Hello Steve, yes ALYA has disappointed us all. I too am a hurting shareholder. However, I have been professional investor for 19 years and have never worked for a company with the upside of ALYA. Let me try to persuade you. Last week the Chairman of Cisco mentioned Echelon and the new network they have created for devices called LONworks. Echelon ran from $4 to $20 in 3 days. I believe ALYA will be a key player in LONworks. ALYA does have an announced agreement with Motorola (card readers) and a negotiated but not signed deal with CSI of Dallas. These are very real companies that do not sign agreements lightly. Yes there has been a delay in sales and in completing more agreements, but they are coming. There should be some good news tomorrow. There is a large trade show in Chicago next Monday where ALYA will be featured in 6-7 booths, including Motorola, Echelon and LONworks. ALYA has a new product that is due to be unveiled at this show. The President of Corinex i Europe has personally funded $250,000 into ALYA, joined the Board of Directors and purchased about $1,000,000 of product. The Chairman of CSI has indicated he will join the Board. Motorola no longer has a research division working on the card readers and will share our booth in Chicago. A former director of a multi billion co. in Toronto is considering joing the Board. These people are all smarter than me and they seem to think ALYA has something important. The Co. still thinks they can make $10,000,000 in slaes this year. If they can, the stock should trade much higher. What else can I say? Dale -----Original Message----- From: SteveHC1@aol.com <SteveHC1@aol.com> To: Dale_Paruk@bc.sympatico.ca <Dale_Paruk@bc.sympatico.ca> Date: Wednesday, January 06, 1999 7:42 PM Subject: Re: Re: Stock sinking to all-time lows... >Dale - My name is Steve Casman (see below); please fill me in on any relevant >info that you can. Thanks. > >In a message dated 1/6/99 8:30:03 AM, you wrote: > ><<Hello Steve, > >yes there is a lot of positive developments. No news until deals are > >completed but I will tell you as much detail as I can. However, I have a > >rule not to talk/email people without knowing who they are. If you are > >willing to tell me your last name I think I can help you feel better about > >ALYA. > >Regards, > >Dale Paruk 1-888-595-6444 > >-----Original Message----- > >From: SteveHC1@aol.com <SteveHC1@aol.com> > >To: stock@alya.com <stock@alya.com> > >Date: Monday, December 28, 1998 8:53 PM > >Subject: Stock sinking to all-time lows... > > > > > >>As an EXTREMELY concerned investor with a very sizeable position > >(stock-wise) > >>in your company, who has seen virtually ALL of your projections fail to > >become > >>observeable reality - as well as the stock sinking to all-time lows: > >> > >>Is there ANYTHING that you could tell me that would give me reason to keep > >the > >>shares vs. dump them all for the tax writeoff? Is there ANYTHING positive > >on > >>the near-term horizon that's definite (or at least nearly so)? Ex: Any > >>response from Motorola on the proposal(s), or is that a no-go too? > > > > > >----------------------- Headers -------------------------------- >Return-Path: <Dale_Paruk@bc.sympatico.ca> >Received: from rly-zb01.mx.aol.com (rly-zb01.mail.aol.com [172.31.41.1]) by >air-zb02.mail.aol.com (v55.5) with SMTP; Wed, 06 Jan 1999 08:30:03 -0500 >Received: from mail1.bctel.ca (nfs1.bctel.ca [207.194.28.66]) > by rly-zb01.mx.aol.com (8.8.8/8.8.5/AOL-4.0.0) > with ESMTP id IAA26010 for <SteveHC1@aol.com>; > Wed, 6 Jan 1999 08:30:01 -0500 (EST) >Received: from expwndog (nwmr01m08-92.bctel.ca [209.52.64.92]) > by mail1.bctel.ca with SMTP id FAA21648 > for <SteveHC1@aol.com>; Wed, 6 Jan 1999 05:29:59 -0800 (PST) >Message-ID: <000f01be3978$e3b807e0$5c4034d1@expwndog> >From: "Dale Paruk" <Dale_Paruk@bc.sympatico.ca> >To: <SteveHC1@aol.com> >Subject: Re: Stock sinking to all-time lows... >Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1999 11:56:14 -0800 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="iso-8859-1" >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >X-Priority: 3 >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal >X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4 >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 > >>> > ----------------------- Headers -------------------------------- Return-Path: <Dale_Paruk@bc.sympatico.ca> Received: from rly-yc01.mx.aol.com (rly-yc01.mail.aol.com [172.18.149.33]) by air-yc04.mail.aol.com (v56.22) with SMTP; Tue, 19 Jan 1999 02:37:07 -0500 Received: from mail1.bctel.ca (lakecity-m69.bctel.ca [207.194.28.69]) by rly-yc01.mx.aol.com (8.8.8/8.8.5/AOL-4.0.0) with ESMTP id CAA09102 for <SteveHC1@aol.com>; Tue, 19 Jan 1999 02:37:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from pdb2.bc.sympatico.ca (ts [207.194.28.70]) by mail1.bctel.ca with ESMTP id XAA12802 for <SteveHC1@aol.com>; Mon, 18 Jan 1999 23:37:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from expwndog ([209.52.64.157]) by pdb2.bc.sympatico.ca (8.8.7/8.8.8) with SMTP id XAA15088 for <SteveHC1@aol.com>; Mon, 18 Jan 1999 23:08:32 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <008201be437a$115c8620$9d4034d1@expwndog> From: "Dale Paruk" <Dale_Paruk@bc.sympatico.ca> To: <SteveHC1@aol.com> Subject: Re: Re: Stock sinking to all-time lows... Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 22:40:43 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4

To: Essam Hamza who wrote (2218)	1/24/1999 2:02:00 PM
From: Essam Hamza	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2534

To: TokyoMex (46384 ) From: Kerry Lee Sunday, Jan 24 1999 2:58AM ET Reply # of 46414 Message boards Guidelines used by shorters. 1. Be anonymous, of course. 2. Use 10% fact and 90% suggestion in one's posts. Facts give credibility, while suggestion does the "sell". 3. Let others "help" you learn about a stock thereby developing rapport and a support base. 4. Use multiple handles, but develop a unique style for each. 5. Use multiple ISPs. 6. Start each new handle slowly to build acceptance. 7. Occasionally, use two handles to "discuss" an issue. 8. Do not show all your cards at once when slamming a stock. It's a war - it's ok to lose a battle as long as you save enough ammo to win the war. 9. Know your enemies - they will end up being your best weapons. 10.Only slam until the tide starts to turn. Let doubt carry the stock back with the tide. 11.Maintain an appearance of being open minded but a slant in either direction is acceptable. 12.Don't appear meek. No one follows the meek. 13.Strike just as your opponent starts to gather momentum but not before or you lose your sting. 14.Don't worry if people peg you for a slammer. The doubt will remain and that's what you are after. 15.If pegged, put up a brief fight, then let them feel they've won. This puts their guard down within a few days and your other handles can take over from there. 16.When slamming a stock, the intent is to minimize its rise, not to create an instant plunge. 17.To slam a stock requires you only to kill the dream not the company. 18.Use questions to invoke critical thinking and use statements to reinforce. 19.You can be liberal in your questions but be specific and precise in your statements. 20.Don't lie. 21.When slamming, encourage research beyond calling the company.You know people are far too lazy and it's only doubt you are after, not confirmation. 22.When slamming, discourage people from taking the company's word - encourage them to seek outside proof. If the company's history is bad, point them there. 23.When slamming, refer to missed deadlines and weak financials. 24.When slamming, if the price rises, blame it on a temporary mass reaction to a press release rather than real interest in the stock. Point out low volume and emphasize the selling. 25.Pretend to share the same concerns by learning what they want to hear. 26.And above all else, be unpredictable.