Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : IATV - ACTV Interactive Television -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: art slott who wrote (4020)	1/19/1999 7:37:00 PM
From: mike.com	Respond to of 4748

The boxes are definitely being installed: biz.yahoo.com

To: art slott who wrote (4020)	1/19/1999 7:54:00 PM
From: Ali Khaman	Respond to of 4748

art - You said it!

To: art slott who wrote (4020)	1/19/1999 8:41:00 PM
From: ed doell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4748

Art, I know you're not setting sell stops, but it's been mentioned on other boards and other threads. When a stock goes up some LT holders think they can preserve their capital by putting in sell stops. All they do is put themselves out of the market in that stock. Some of what I am suggesting may have happened in the trading of SFLK today. All sell stops do in a NASDAQ market is encourage MMs on the least pretext to dip the bid, walk it down on low volume and adroit sequencing of trades, to pick those sell stopped shares up and cover their short sales which they made to make a market. This practice is easy for them to do. IMHO, if a shareholder believes in the stock, holding it, unless information to the contrary comes through, is the best policy. IMHO, if a shareholder just has to "play the market, have some trading stock to do it with and leave a LT core. IMHO, by not putting in sell stops, holders contribute to a NASDAQ stock's stability and help to reduce volatility. Just some thoughts, all IMHO, Ed