Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (7270)	1/21/1999 3:27:00 AM
From: Pallisard	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

Haven't heard this much concerted aggression by the nays in a long time, looks like an e-mail conspiracy. I think the intensity of their panic is directly proportional to their desperation - a bullish sign indeed.

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (7270)	1/21/1999 4:11:00 AM
From: Bruce A. Thompson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

Larry, It just slays me to read the hype. We drew them a picture of the floorless strategy. Now they are seeing it happen every day and calling it "That mysterious seller" and "Internet investors misinterpreting the S3". I have to ask, How many "Internet" investors have large blocks to sell? These people are as bad as I was at CTYS. The December Short Interest report should be out soon. Somebody call Investor relations and ask them how many shares are outstanding this week. Bruce

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (7270)	1/21/1999 9:37:00 AM
From: Mark Johnson	Respond to of 27311

Larry: Did someone refer to you as a Turd? Just a turd or a left handed turd a one armed turd. We need to get this straight. What kind of turd are you anyway or is it Noway?

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (7270)	1/21/1999 11:43:00 AM
From: Tickertype	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

<<Ticker, first, I didn't see gvander refer to any of the VLNC bulls as a turd. Second, I keep telling you guys if you don't want me posting here, you might suggest to FMK he knock off the b.s. He had been relatively restrained for a few days so you didn't see much out of me. But today I couldn't restrain myself when he made the "professional investors" and "misinterpreting the S-3" comments.>> Larry, as you know I haven't called you any such names. Also, in my jab at gvander I did not mention you. But why should FMK not be allowed to post his views, no matter how bullish they might be? Any more than those of you who continuously bash the company are allowed to post your views? Frankly, I continue to be puzzled by the amount of time all you naysayers, who claim not to have a position in the stock, spend on the board. Obviously we all have different views of what these boards are all about. I tend to think of them as places where those who are enthusiastic about a particular stock can get together and compare views, something like people who are into antiques or sailing or whatever would get together. Those who want to rain on our parade are certainly accomplishing their task,as it does annoy us, which is why we some times respond like we do. I have a fairly big position in this company, and could sell it at a profit right now. But I'm not about about to do that. I remain totally convinced that the company will ultimately be a huge success, and the bickering that goes on while we wait will not change that fact. Incidentally, someone was speculating that gvander might be a fat lady. Having referred to herself as "Mrs. g.v. ander" in the past, she is a woman all right, but a lady? I don't see any such signs. Fat? Wouldn't surprise me! - T -