Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dennis DeNoble who wrote (9054)	1/21/1999 7:06:00 PM
From: Anthony Zack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

Thanks for the update, Dennis. After reading this, I get the feeling that, like MXAM, Global is discovering that the desert ore is not homogenous. We now have two dirts testing for the best ore for larger scale processing. I guess this means that trucking good dirt from the Oro may be cheaper than processing average dirt from the Hassey. Although a little discouraged that we are still onion peeling, at least we are going after the higher quality onions!! Regarding the "...reducing constituents that interfere with the recovery process." comment, I wonder if this could mean that a certain blundering mill employee was served his walking papers?? Tony

To: Dennis DeNoble who wrote (9054)	1/21/1999 9:45:00 PM
From: Scott Wheeler	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

Dennis, Thanks for the update. I like the sound of the progress - however, I'm not sure I understand what the sentence <<On this shipment, our analysis method produced metal in hand.>> means. It makes some sense to me sans the "On this shipment" phrase, but with the phrase added in it puzzles me, as I am a bear of very little brain. Maybe it means that this shipment was an "analysis shipment", i.e., a test of some sort. Or maybe it wasn't a test - & what was meant was that that "The method used produced metal in hand and thus the material shipped was extracted using this [worthwhile] method"? Can you illuminate/translate or ask MM what he meant...many thanks SW

To: Dennis DeNoble who wrote (9054)	1/21/1999 9:46:00 PM
From: J.E.Currie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

Dinoble, I rest my case! This news release is the most unprofessional yet. Again I request your resume Dinoble to support your P/R experience and high school education. My nine year old boy has better command of sentence structure and the language. Go ahead and tell us that you wrote that verbatim. Zeev for President Jack for VP Bob for treasurer Richard for Secretary Be gone, once and for all, all responsible for Global's horrendous slide and give us Leadership and a gold equivalent 3/4 opt. Jensen, you should be embarrassed. You call this leadership. jec

To: Dennis DeNoble who wrote (9054)	1/21/1999 10:09:00 PM
From: Chuca Marsh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

Folks...guys and gals...this is THE most important phrase:<<.. our assessment of the different phases of our metals recovery process...>> Scott, your grasping at the release missed the OBVIOUS <VBG>...you with grande braine ore! See what I see...a way of t4esting ANOTHER recovery method....and he got something in his DAM BAR HAND!!! Metal in Hand, JEC..watchout least Dennis have your ...FOOT IN MOUTH. This might be what we are all waiting for...then again...as they said in the Army...I want some voluntees..."All Colege Guys get up here!" That was the day when the Army was made up of college guys for privates....and it seemed back then, that, that piece of paper didn't matter...spoken from a grad school drop out here...Hell...I hear some on this thread are Masters guys doing stuff in alternate professions...they seem to have a new generation of folks who like to do what the like to do. Does that make...so much sense? Yes..it does to many now. My Kid #2 told me today she would like to open a Cafe! Maybe....like JECs...time will tell. If we gots the goods...and have it independantly verrified...that would be Jensens final proof...no hyping and just doing. Read between the lines....maybe that is all we can do. Maybe Dennis will be the cog in the wheel that kept it turning ...maybe...it is all meant to be this way. Go read Jaba Threads//PR today..want well written..Geologist of the Year ...and me telling the Com-pany President that I held EVERY DAM SHARE as it sank from 75 Cents to the Dime og this year share price! And proud ...that judgement sometimes says...ya have to roll with the punches! Jim over there said..."You really did? Good!" I bet Dick over here would say the same for many of you...I never talked to him..only Dennis. I vote for Dennis and Mike. ( OK, And Scott..and Bob..OK..Richard the Foreseer)(Jacka the Generalistnutritionalist) Chuca

To: Dennis DeNoble who wrote (9054)	1/21/1999 10:11:00 PM
From: Robert Ray	Respond to of 14226

What????!!!!**

To: Dennis DeNoble who wrote (9054)	1/22/1999 1:45:00 PM
From: san antonio group	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 14226

Dennis, Thank you very much for the update and taking the time to talk to me on the phone.I hope you can ignore all the cheap talk on the thread about you and the current management.I am excited about the progress and think things are on track with Mike McKay behind production!I look forward to updates on the progress.I wouldn't blame you a bit if you don't update this thread because all the personal attacks against you,but some of us are behind you 100%!You have my E-mail address and myself and the group would appreciate any and all updates you have or receive from Mike McKay. Thanks again SAN ANTONIO GROUP