To: The Irb who wrote (10419 ) 1/23/1999 8:35:00 PM From: Catfish Respond to of 13994
Observation: Novak Compares Clinton to Hitler CNN Capital Gang On Capital Gang tonight, Bob Novak said Clinton's state of the union speech reminded him of a man in his youth in a far away land. He said the speech was very totalitarian. perhaps someone will post the transcript. Posted by: Freedom Wins (emailname) * 01/23/99 16:33:27 PST ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To: Freedom Wins And all the dumbo-rats and news media jerks said Seig-Heil, Seig-Heil, Seig-Heil!!!!!!!!! From: Walkin Man (hitler@WH.gov) * 01/23/99 16:44:01 PST ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To: Walkin Man That should be "Sieg Heil" or "Hail Victory". Sad to say, this is one of the things that Hitler borrowed from the Romans. From: kermit (ml3127@power-net.net) * 01/23/99 16:46:10 PST ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To: Freedom Wins I think there are a lot of similarities between Clinton and Hitler in their political techniques. Both are masters of the "Big Lie". Both were great at staged photo opportunities. Twice now I have seen Der Clinton signing some crime bill flanked by rows of stern uniformed police (or extras, who knows). This reminded me of newsreels of the Nuremburg rallies before the war. Follow that up with the bunker mentality and use of the scapegoats and these two guys ain't that diverse. Thank God for the 22nd Amendment. From: parsifal (parsifal@arkansas.net) * 01/23/99 16:52:58 PST ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To: kermit Bob Novak is right. For many years Clinton and the Democrat Party have been using tactics similar to those used by The National Socialist Party of Germany (NAZIS). Control the media and the schools in order to funnel the continuous stream of lies and propaganda to the sheeple. The next step after that was to demonize, dehumanize, and destroy the enemy. (Jews, gypsies, and others deemed undesirables). Hitler and Joseph Goebbels, his Minister of Propaganda used the great lie many times to their benefit. The greater the lie, the more chance it has of being believed. Notice the party line talking points the last few years of the same propaganda and lies repeated and distributed by the Democrat Party shills in the left wing media. Plus they have the public schools dumbed down now and controlled by the teachers unions so they can readily funnel their left wing propaganda thru the schools. Next step towards a totalitarian socialist state is confiscation of guns which they are now trying to do by lawsuits. From: boney (hl1912@communique.net) * 01/23/99 16:56:14 PST ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To: parsifal If "public opinion polls" were around in Germany in 1939, Adolph Hitler would have had numbers just like Clinton (probably even higher, actually). Following the "logic" prevalent in the republic today, that means the German people were completely justified in allowing the initiation of World War II and the Holocaust to occur. From: Walrus (emailname) * 01/23/99 17:03:11 PST ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To: Freedom Wins The similarities are striking. Look how many people around Clinton end up dead. They're both socialists, gun-grabbers, and don't kid yourself, for all his talk of inclusive policies, Clinton is an eliteist who believes that he's superior to all conservatives and would silence his critics in a heartbeat if he could (of course he gets the next best thing in a press that censures everything anti-Clinton). What should scare people is that feminists, blacks, gays, etc., support this man totally and faithfully like he's a god (just like the Germans did Hitler) just because he pushes their agendas. I guess these groups would have liked Hitler too, "hey, he's not a bad guy" they would say, "as long as we get what we want, so what if he kills a few million people?" From: contra () * 01/23/99 17:05:18 PST -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To: Freedom Wins The Capital Gang was so lowkey on Lewinsky tonight, that I thought at first it was not a live show. I wonder if that was intentional. From: top of the world ma (emailname) * 01/23/99 17:06:25 PST ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To: parsifal Clinton as Hitler? Co-starring James Carville as Joseph Goebbels; Al Gore as Rudolf Hess (too nuts to understand what is going on); Jerrold Nadler as Herman Goering (fat boys); Barney Frank as Ernst Roehm (Pudgy-faced homosexuals); Monica Lewinsky as Eva Braun (Hillary has to settle for guest shot as Tokyo Rose); Bruce Lindsay as Martin Bormann (secretive, rodent-faced advisors); Janet Reno as Heinrich Himmler (strong physical resemblance) and in his greatest role, Henry (I'm gonna tan that boys) Hyde as Winston Churchill, withstanding the darkest days but eventually triumphing over evil. Welcome more roles for the flick. From: speedy (emailname) * 01/23/99 17:09:28 PST ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To: Walrus GREAT POINT! I've been saying this all along when I 'vomit' over the opinion polls. And don't forget Russia. If opinion polls had been around in the 1920's and early 30's (while millions of rural Russians were starving to death due to a protracted famine by Stalin), the Russian sheeple would have almost unanimously polled in favor of Stalin! AND... even after they learned how many millions of their countrymen were purged by Stalin, they STILL supported him. To this day, many would still support him if he came back from the grave. I think we are dealing with basically two factors here. First, there are the very literate liberal academicians who WANT what Clinton stands for and who would somehow justify his actions even if it were learned that he deliberately set up the OK City bombing in order to get his terrorism bills passed. And SECONDLY, there are the severely mislead and misinformed who plot their course based on what they overhear (a few minutes a day) by Dan Rather, and the other national media heads. They are not illiterate (though some actually are) in the strict sense of the word, but they are ignorant, ignorant, ignorant. Most of them don't vote at all, or only occasionally, and they easily accept the status quo just as long as it doesn't upset their soccer games or sitting in their easy chairs (with a beer sitting the fold out cup holder compartment) and mindlessly viewing what is really the 'opiate for the masses' - SPORTS! If some of these jokers knew only a fraction as much about what is going on in their country as they do sports statistics, things might be different. So would someone please tell me why the American people would be more difficult ot mislead than the Germans or the Russians were in the first half of this century? HUH? Steve Van Osdell From: svanos (svanos@supern.com) *freerepublic.com