SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John Lacelle who wrote (29386)1/22/1999 11:44:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 67261
 
John? Why would Clinton have expected the DNA not to match? If you think this indicates Starr's "integrity", you'll have to explain what definition of the word you're operating under. If you think Starr could have leaked a false report to the press and gotten away with it, well, you can think what you want, I guess. Starr has gotten away with a lot of leaks of "secret" grand jury testimony, but I never heard him accused of deliberately leaking false information. I'd guess Drudge has other sources for that kind of stuff.



To: John Lacelle who wrote (29386)1/23/1999 7:49:00 AM
From: Bearcatbob  Respond to of 67261
 
John, When the dust settles it will be seen that there are no people of character in the democratic organization. There are no John Deans who when faced with the reality of what was done stood up and told the truth. For the democrats there is only mindless party loyalty.

I have lost respect for Moynihan and Kerry. I never had any for the rest. Slick is their man and they will stay with him no matter what.

Could you imagine the things that Herold Ickes could tell or Bluementahl. You know, maybe we know why Foster had to commit suicide. Perhaps he had a conscience that could not stomach what was going on and at the same time not the willingness to speak out against the Arkansas gang. Wouldn't love to know.

So after the trail what. The scandals will go on at the lower levels of the administration if Janet does her job - e.g. if Slick didn't direct the FBI files who did? By the time they work there way up slick will be out of office.

Why people ruin their reputations for this man is beyond me.

Bob



To: John Lacelle who wrote (29386)1/23/1999 10:50:00 PM
From: Les H  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
When the Government Plays Investor

nytimes.com

Clinton's plan is a non-starter. Most current national retirement plans with government controlling investment options lose money. If those guys didn't work in the government, they probably couldn't find jobs anywhere, except perhaps academia.