Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Nuinsco Resources (NWI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E. Charters who wrote (209)	1/23/1999 12:21:00 PM
From: 1king	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 5821

EC, I'll try and respond but this is my last post so please forgive me if I miss something. 1) Economic quantities of Ni are from the olivine not the gneiss 2) Ni is not crustal, unless we include re-mobilization as a mode of genesis 2) Depth studies are academic and sulfur isotopes are frequently inconclusive. I am not sure about the "squishy-ite" as a depth indicator. 4) Gabbro...mantle derive....is there crustal gabbro? 5) Cinder cones....pyrite are we heading towards a VMS discussion??? 6) Outgassing.... vents... radial... metastable????????????????????? RE: William of Ockham...........I don't see the "simple theory" in your monologue BUT our loose comparisons to other deposits (VB, Nor, Sud. etc.) is the rational exploration attempt to explain unknown with the known. BUT it seems we have now transgressed logic to compare it with EVERYTHING "known" (used very loosely):-) Thanks for the read, gotta rest my eyes. Regards 1King P.S. Red I can't find that reference to the location maybe it was on this thread?