Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Queenstake Resources (QTR.T) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Steve Joy who wrote (1776)	1/24/1999 7:16:00 PM
From: nadroj	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 2249

FGX was offered this property and refused to take it. I wonder why, it probably has no value!

To: Steve Joy who wrote (1776)	1/27/1999 4:54:00 AM
From: Shirley Owen	Respond to of 2249

Hi Steve, I'm sorry, but I just now noticed that I hadn't answered your post #1777 of Jan.23. FGX did not give the location of those holes but the info came from Kevin Joseph in his conversation with Doris on Jan.14:"The next set of holes at Y51 will be Drilled shortly and will be targeted bordering Francisco." You can read his whole post at: Message 7284501 I believe the first two holes were drilled on the central section of the claim according to their past plans for this property. In the NR from FGX they said: "Recently Francisco completed an IP/Resistivity survey covering the southwest extension of the West zone's central feeder system. The geophysical results indicate that there is continuity of a higher resistivity, silicified zone over 250 metres southwest of the area previously drilled. Several holes are planned to test this silicified zone." This would be heading toward the Guinoloza border.I guess that is why QTR has moved the drills near the border with FGX. Again, I must apologize for the oversight. Cheers Shirley