Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : NIFTY NINE IN NINETY NINE PLUS ONE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mike McFarland who wrote (208)	1/23/1999 3:48:00 PM
From: Arthur Radley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 613

Good information on stem cell. Keep it up(:>). Just returned from business trip (Tuesday thru Saturday) so there will not be a contest update this weekend....have to give wife some attention and maybe she will give me some attention(:>).

To: Mike McFarland who wrote (208)	1/23/1999 7:08:00 PM
From: WWS	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 613

Mike, I notice that you are also in CNSI, which proves your bravery ( I was in CNSI back about 3 years ago, but no longer). Reading about CNSI's delisting I remembered that I hold a small NASDAQ listed firm CHDX that does business in China. Last year was a bad one for them and their shares (about 6 mm outstanding) now trade at about $.50/each). They have received a delisting notice from NASDAQ which, if they're unable to appeal and postpone, they'll counter by doing an 8 - 1 (or maybe 5 - 1) reverse split. My question is, in your opinion, would it be better for them to do reverse split in order to keep listed, or instead just to move to OTC:BB with their current share structure intact? Do you know of any firms which, once delisted, managed to regain NASDAQ listing? Thanks, Bill

To: Mike McFarland who wrote (208)	1/23/1999 9:39:00 PM
From: LLCF	Respond to of 613

Mike... followed you over here... good stuff. As you will remember I also "glaumed" up the opening on Friday and CTII is now by far my largest holding. I wouldn't do it JUST for the news, but the stock seems promising and really bombed out as well. Not that it means anything, and it's not a reason to buy the stock on it's own but perhaps for the timing, I find that where there's smoke there's fire. I wouldn't be surprised to see this "press" continue and even escalate scaring some interest into the stocks. DAK