SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : CYBERIAN GULAG + other thoughts -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ztect who wrote (1)1/23/1999 11:35:00 PM
From: ztect  Respond to of 193
 
When To Sell That Great Internet Stock?

Source:

INTERNET STOCK NEWS™
internetstocknews.com
The Premiere Internet Industry Communication Vehicle
January 12, 1999

When To Sell That Great Internet Stock?

By ISN Analyst, Ted Kunzog

Knowing that stocks over an investor's lifetime are likely to return only
10-12% per year on average, an investor should be very cautious about
their
"hot" Internet stock that recently doubled, tripled or perhaps more. With
that kind of behavior, the next move may be in half, rather than double.
So, how and when to sell?

First off, selling all of the stock is frequently a mistake. Yes, it may
have been the exact top, but it probably was not. If the stock continued to
gain again after it was sold, the investor often is consumed with mental
agony. To be a successful investor, care of one's psyche is often just as
important as picking the right stocks.

To decide when to sell, then, investors may wish to consider either
selling just enough to get their original investment back, or using Stop Orders
(sometimes called Stop-loss Orders).

The first strategy is rather simple. Assume an investor bought 1,000
shares of Hotstock.com for $5 per share (or $5,000.00) and it is now selling for
$20 per share (or $20,000). The investor would simply sell 250 shares at
$20 per share to get the original $5,000 stake back, leaving the investor
with 750 shares left. This is called "using the house's money." A
modification, of course, is to sell more than enough to return the original
investment and to lock in a profit.

The advantage of this strategy (besides the simplicity) is that an
investor
guarantees the return of the original investment or locks in a profit.
Meanwhile, the investor still participates if the stock continues to run.

The last strategy, using Stop Orders, is extremely powerfully but underused
by many investors as they do not understand them. There are two types of
Stop Orders that can be used to sell a stock, a Sell Stop Order and a Stop
Limit Order.

In a Sell Stop Order, the investor sets a Stop Price with the Broker. If
the stock price moves below the Stop Price, the order becomes a Market
Order, to be executed at the next available price.

If the investor set a Stop Price of $15 per share for 1,000 shares of
Hotstock.com and it moved below that price, the broker would automatically
sell 1,000 shares at the next available asking price, no matter if it is
above or below the $15 Stop Price. (It should also be noted the order can
be for any number of shares, not just the full 1,000 shares).

The advantage of the Sell Stop Order is that the investor is ensured that
the stock will be sold. The disadvantage is that the investor is not sure
the minimum price the sale will take place.

With a Sell Stop Limit Order, the investor tells the broker of two prices:
the Stop Price (as before) and the Limit Price (the minimum price the stock
should be sold at). (One quick word to interject here, Stop and Stop Limits
are sometimes dangerous on the OTC BB because the exchange is actually a
quotation system controlled by market makers. They can simply place 100
share block orders until they approach the stop and leave you selling the
stock at far lower than you wanted. -Chris A.)

Assume again the investor set a Stop Price of $15 per share for 1,000
shares of Hotstock.com as well as a Limit Price of $14. If the stock moved
below the Stop Price of $15, it will then be sold at any price above $14
(if the price never returns above $14, it will not be sold).

The advantage of the Sell Stop Order is that the investor is sure of the
minimum price the shares will be sold for. The disadvantage is that the
shares may never be sold (we all know that Internet Stocks can move
extremely rapidly, both Up and Down).

One caution when using any type of stop order: avoid setting the Stop
Price too close to the current price. This will avoid selling the stock
unnecessarily. In general, the Stop Price should be kept 15-25% below the
current price. Assuming the stock continues to go up, the Stop Price
should also be raised.

The biggest advantage in using Stop Orders is that it lets the market tell
us when its time to sell. Investors should be aware, however, that not all
brokers accept Stop Orders on all stocks – something you may wish to
consider when selecting a broker!

The last thing to do after selling any stock (no matter which method you
choose) is to quit worrying about what it does after you sold it. There
will be other stocks and other days, the sun will come up again tomorrow
just as it did today.



To: ztect who wrote (1)1/23/1999 11:43:00 PM
From: ztect  Read Replies (6) | Respond to of 193
 
Journal; Larry Flynt Stoned......BORROWED WISDOM

January 16, 1999, Saturday

By FRANK RICH


We didn't need Larry Flynt to tell us that Bob Barr is a hypocrite. The Georgia Congressman's sleazy marital history was already public back in '96 when he had the gall to champion an absurd bill called the Defense of Marriage Act -- which that other proud defender of marriage, Bill Clinton, then signed into law. But we may need Larry Flynt anyway -- not to expose any impeachment manager's sex life but simply because his very presence exposes the disingenuousness of everybody else, conservative and liberal, Republican and Democrat, press and public, who inhabits the epic Bosch canvas that is Monicagate. In the land of the pious hypocrite, the honest pornographer is king.

After a year in which the President repeatedly told us he didn't have sex with that woman, and his antagonists repeatedly told us that their case ''is not about sex,'' and the media constantly lamented how horribly sad they were to be covering this sex-driven, albeit lucrative, story, Mr. Flynt's candor is downright refreshing. In interviews, he refers to himself as a ''smut publisher'' who wants ''to sell [his] magazine,'' not a public-minded seeker of truth. He openly declares his partisanship (''I love Clinton. He's a great President.'') and eagerly declares his hope to have ''the effect of derailing the impeachment process.'' The Hustler editor who serves as Mr. Flynt's collaborator in tracking down Congressional trysts unabashedly describes their enterprise as ''vandalism,'' not journalism.

It is almost too delicious to watch Mr. Flynt throw his high-minded colleagues in the news business into conniptions. Washington's bloviator-in-chief, David Broder, brooded on PBS about how ''the mainstream press'' now has its agenda set by ''the bottom-feeders in our business'' -- yet he works for the paper (The Washington Post) that first popped the adultery question to a Presidential candidate (Gary Hart) and is a regular on ''Meet the Press,'' the first mainstream Sunday gabfest that made a panelist out of Matt Drudge, the Clinton-haters' answer to Mr. Flynt (though not as factually accurate).

Mr. Flynt's antics have similarly prompted many mainstream TV news outlets -- CNBC, ABC's ''20/ 20,'' CNN, ''CBS This Morning'' -- to demonstrate yet again that, for all their pious declarations to the contrary, the scandals they care most about are those with sex. The sexual allegations about Mr. Barr have received far more play than the revelations of the Congressman's involvement with a white supremacist organization -- much as TV pursued Monica rather than Clinton fund-raising and wag-the-dog scandals, and largely ignored Henry Hyde's S.&L. shenanigans and Dan Burton's campaign-finance chicanery to air their sexual histories instead. The viewing audience, which tells pollsters it's had enough sex, exercises its own hypocrisy by rewarding Mr. Flynt's appearance on ''Rivera Live'' with the show's highest rating since the O. J. civil verdict.

The other hypocrites unmasked by Mr. Flynt's pranks could fill a cabinet department. It's hard to stop laughing when Dick Morris, who sucked prostitutes' toes while on the White House payroll, decries the publisher for ''degrading American politics.'' Jerry Falwell, a past Flynt legal foe, now goes on TV to condemn his old adversary's tactics -- never mind that Mr. Falwell himself marketed a video accusing the President of murder.
Conservative politicians and publications that happily feasted on a tabloid's purchase of Gennifer Flowers's revelations and the recent Drudge-spread hoax about an illegitimate Clinton son are now fuming about Mr. Flynt. Liberals and feminists who vehemently attacked a Hollywood film for ostensibly sanitizing the Hustler publisher's odious depiction of women are curiously silent about his pursuit of Barr & Co. As for the President, his spokesman, Joe Lockhart, says that his boss wants Mr. Flynt to ''cease and desist.'' Oh, puh-leeze!

Larry Flynt is a bull in the china shop of false pieties, empty pretensions and sexual sermonizing that have brought us to this low moment in American history. On Thursday, alas, he checked into a Los Angeles hospital with pneumonia. The networks that have been broadcasting soap operas rather than the Senate trial their anchors keep telling us is ''historic'' can only pray that Mr. Flynt, who has it in his power to make impeachment must-see TV again, gets well soon.



To: ztect who wrote (1)1/24/1999 12:45:00 PM
From: Boyd Zander  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 193
 
Cyberforce Patrols The Internet

Title of an article in Sunday's Chicago Tribune(see url provided below). Discusses fraud perpetrated through the use of online stock chat rooms and message boards. Identifies this problem and discusses what the SEC and others are or are not doing about it. Is a good read but too long to post in entirety.

chicagotribune.com

Take Care all

Boyd Zander