Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PanAmerican BanCorp (PABN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bobkern who wrote (24000)	1/24/1999 4:21:00 PM
From: bobkern	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 43774

Having forwarded these post, I now have a question? Is there any original shareholder of PRWT, pre-PanAmerican Bancorp, who could comment on this? Did you ever recieve anything in the mail confirming the reverse-merger? Please share it here or anything else that you true "longs" have to say about this discussion. Personally, I am convinced this in fact is a done deal and has been for some time. I have never believed that we own a shell company that is "toilet paper". Since I first bought in June during the runnup, I have done some substantial digging, made numerous phone calls, to learn everything I can. I feel very secure in my investment and the return it will bring me. Yes, I am losing patience with the lack of news. Yes, I would like to see some financials, RIGHT NOW. But, for peace of mind, I suggest others continue to try to get their questions answered so that they can be as comfortable with their investment as I am. If you don't like what you learn, then sell. I have no problems with the legitimate questions being posed here. As long as nobody make personal attacks and doesn't brow beat issues that they can't support, ask away. Thats why I posted those shareholders notes today. I thought it might aid in the discussions. I am anxious to hear what the "oldtimers" have to say. Did you foks receive anything after the meeting? Thanks for listening, Bob