Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PanAmerican BanCorp (PABN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jhild who wrote (24014)	1/24/1999 8:54:00 PM
From: LegalBeast	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 43774

Facts lad facts. You want me to refute your flawed lies? The lie was that John made a misleading statement when he stated that he was getting more space. You have offered NO facts, only your lie vieled in a leading question. For your feeble uneducated mind, that is a statement which assumes facts that, in this case, do not exist and makes a question to which there can be only one answer, in this case an agreement that your lie must be true. You have offered NO facts to support the statement offered in your leading question. Therefore we must assume that you have no facts on this issue and are lying. You say that I have misquoted you in your post. Your observation does not lead one to the conclusion that John was misleading. It is a total non-sequeter. You would like me to have been attacking your statement about how many folks were trading at any one point in time, but as I said, the number of folks trading at one point in time is irrelevant. What is relevant is your lie about the potential increase in size, to which you have offered no facts. Either you have proof that John is not seeking larger space or you do not. If you do ot, then you are lying. It is that simple. You would like to believe that I am attacking you, but unlike you, I attack only your lies. You, on the other hand attack me personally with accusations, insults, etc. I am after the truth here and you do not seem to be able to offer anything on the truth. The only thing you offer is not helpful to anyone trying to understand PRWT. So where are your facts that support your lie that John is not in the process of increasing IT space?

To: jhild who wrote (24014)	1/24/1999 9:11:00 PM
From: Scottoo	Respond to of 43774

Legal, In the current era of good feeling(was that Warren G. Harding?), I believe that any correspondence to this person is irrelevant and a waste of time. You don't argue with a stone which has no feeling. Ignore him. He is the past. We are the future. With the dialogue we now have going, his posts will not only be humorous, yet sad, but, totally without merit. The parade has passed him by. Let him rant; his posts are gossamer, totally without substance. Nice to see what goes around, comes around. This is so refreshing Warm Regards, Scottoo