SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Insignia Solutions (INSG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Christopher Horner who wrote (547)1/24/1999 7:59:00 PM
From: Luce Wildebeest  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1606
 
A fine post from the Yahoo INSGY thread by Javaaah...

156 of 159
Interesting thread ! I'd like to clarify a couple of points, and build an argument for
why JENE is invaluable as a Java enabler for embedded devices ...

Firstly, Sun's Java Embedded Server (or nanoserver) is NOT a Java virtual
machine .. it is essentially a Java application that runs on top of the virtual machine.
Ditto JINI from Sun runs on top of a virtual machine.

**Crucial** : If the VM doesn't perform and fit the constraints of the embedded
device (i.e; VM doesn't use lots of memory), then both nanoserver and JINI have
problems (ditto Java apps in general). Conversely if the VM provides peformance
and is small, then its a great marriage of technologies. So, what do we have in the
way of such technology for embedded devices, and what do they offer?? ...

Well, VMs are available from Sun (the "JDK" includes the VM), HP, Insignia, and
others.

HP's is not state of the art. See their paper on Chai. The level of Java technology is
supports is old. It is also slow (see next paragraph).

Sun's VM was originally designed for the desktop, where memory and speed
abound ... quite different from an embedded device. Sun are having to get to grips
with shoe horning it down to the embedded world, and have no current solution for
providing a performant VM on an embedded device (the usual way for making
Java run faster is to provide some form of compilation system, known as a "JIT" is
Sun parlance. A JIT converts Java applications (including those downloaded over
the net)on the fly into the machine code for the CPU on which the VM is running. A
VM does not have to have a JIT, but as a bare minimum it must have an
"interpreter" which is SLOWWWW ...

-------------------

*** JITs are memory hungry, and don't fit nicely into the embedded world ***

--------------------

Sun's embedded VM, and HP's do NOT provide JITs. Companies that are Sun
licencees will have ported Sun's VM to their embedded platforms, and so are
currently suffering the same problems. RTOS vendors are typically Sun licencees
also, and so, same problem!

To get over the performance issue, some companies are suggesting that Java
applications for embedded devices are "statically compiled" (i.e; converted to the
appropriate machine code for the device's CPU) upfront, and "burnt in" to the
device. This strategy does NOT provide a performant solution to Java applications
which are delivered on the fly into a device (over some sort of network). You
cannot convert up front something you haven't seen yet!!!

Sun's nanoserver and JINI both essentially involve delivering Java on the fly to
devices ... so static compilation has problems in this scenario. If performance is
required, and small memory usage is required, then:

*** enter Insignia's JENE. ***

See Insignia's white paper ... JENE is a technology suite, which includes a
configurable VM with low memory footprint, and a ***dynamic compiler** which
provides the performance boost that JITs provide in the desktop environment.
JENE is the only technology available to date that provides this. None of the other
VMs available for embedded devices has this functionality, and are a long way off,
if you read their white papers.

The Memorandum of understanding between Sun and Insignia would seem to imply
that Sun are taking a proactive view towards JENE. It seems to me that both
companies could be of assistance to each other. If Insignia gets Sun's blessing as a
Java enabler, my guess is that Insignia has a very healthy future.

That's why I own Insignia stock!!!!!

Javaaah