Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PanAmerican BanCorp (PABN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jhild who wrote (24040)	1/24/1999 9:51:00 PM
From: Scottoo	Respond to of 43774

Tell us why she left, other than unsubstantiated assumptions on your part. Come on, jhild, why did she leave? Facts man, facts. You remind me of me of the old "Howdy Doody" show, though it was a little behind my time. There was a character, as I recall; Mr. Phineas T. Bluster, lots of talk, but nothing of substance. Again, why did she leave. Tell us facts

To: jhild who wrote (24040)	1/24/1999 10:27:00 PM
From: Valkyrie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 43774

"may have left"...etc...you do not know, so you gonna put your crazy spin on it and assume your normal worst of it...just because you twist it all around dont make it so, son...and im going to prove it to you now...sooner or later it is going to occur to you how rediculous you are...assuming i live long enough...i will teach you what ridicule is, jhild... mary feder left for personal family reasons which are none of anyones business except hers... mary feder was an experienced professional with an exemplary background, which made her nobodys fool...except yours, of course... mary feder considered panam for a month before she took the job... mary feder has no desire to commit career suicide by attaching herself to a bad deal and ruining her career... mary feder originally approached panam... mary feder may return if she chooses, and she may do just that... jhild refuses to listen to anything that anyone has to say about anything, at any time, but in this post that i reference here, jhild refer to jhilds own "suggestion" as if that means anything... jhild makes a living with his "suggestions", a good many of which are originated by jhild... it has been "suggested" that jhild could possibly have slept with rock hudson... jhild has yet to prove that he did not sleep with rock hudson... jhild is avoiding the fact that he may have slept with rock hudson... jhild has not yet provided a notorized affidavit of jhilds "disclaimation" that jhild did not sleep with rock hudson... jhilds attitude toward this type of avoidance makes it obvious that jhild could possibly have slept with rock hudson... i would not be "perfectly comfortable accepting without reservation the hearsay evidence of" jhild, that he did not sleep with rock hudson... without further proof, "notorized affidavit", and stuff like that, it becomes obvious to the rest of us with whom jhild has spent a great deal of his time... hey, if it works for him, it works for me... "how - about - a - nice - game - of - chess"...computer...war room...cheyenne mountain, boulder colorado..."war games"...

To: jhild who wrote (24040)	1/25/1999 11:59:00 AM
From: LegalBeast	Respond to of 43774

OK, continue to bash me. You just don't get it do you. You keep wanting definite proof that something does not exist when the reality is that YOU must show that it does before anyone will believe you. The world does not work that way. The burden is on YOU to prove otherwise, not on us to prove that Mary has an absolute right to her privacy. Mary has stated that her reasons are personal and in fact YOU have no right to claim otherwise. Yup, without a statement from Mary that proves YOUR claim, you are without merit. Mary's private life shall remain just that, private. Of course in your world I suppose that even a person's intimate thoughts should be yours to know, Huh? But, keep at it. You are continuing to show how idiotic your assumptions are.