Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mooter775 who wrote (7457)	1/24/1999 10:14:00 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27311

mooter, it seems that tomorrow may provide you that shakeout opportunity, the combination of the Barron's article (which I found less than "professional") and the shaking going on in Asia tonight might combine to create a retest of the low 6' tomorrow. If that holds, it actually could be quite bullish from a technical point of view. If it breaks later during the week, all bets are off, IMHO. Zeev

To: mooter775 who wrote (7457)	1/24/1999 11:04:00 PM
From: MGV	Respond to of 27311

"I really do think that LD was interviewed for this article last fall ..." Rumor, innuendo, and your convoluted attempts to pass off what you "think" as something more than rumor and innuendo. Both you and fmk love to start off your lines with "rumor has it ..." "My sources tell me ..." "I think ...." (I understand it is a secretive industry. Apparently you either really believe you are innoculated from the secretiveness or you are even more dishonest than you implicitly accuse the author of being.) It only takes two to play the game you play. If you "really think" that the author's use of the term "recent" was so misleading as to refer to an interview that took place as far back as you allege, why don't you or one of your colleague researchers call the author up and settle it? I know why. You might get the wrong answer.