Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PanAmerican BanCorp (PABN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ColleenB who wrote (24046)	1/24/1999 10:33:00 PM
From: ISOMAN	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 43774

Question #1 IS there anyone here that did not realize that PRWT was a Shell last June, when they bought into PRWT? Question #2 Is there anyone here who bought shares in the PRWT shell that did not consider that the merger might not go through, since the prior merger announced in March did not go through. Question #3 Is there anyone who was not concerned when StyleWriter and Kevinl(now called Currency) Seemed to know about all of the pending news, before anyone else. Question #4 Is there anyone who bought shares of PRWT which trades on the OTC-BB , that did not know that OTC-BB companies are very risky? Question #5 Is there anyone who invested in the PRWT Shell that did not say to themselves "It is risky to invest in OTC stocks, I could lose all of my investment, but on the other hand I could make a lot" Question #6 Did anyone force you to buy PRWT Question #7 When Red flags popped up, did you decide to hold on to your shares? If so, why did you hold on? Question #8 How many of you bought prwt based on a recommendation by Top Dog or Reasons3227 Question #9 Those of you who bought on recommendations by Reasons3227 or Top Dog, did you buy, with the intension to hold for 3 to 5 years....or were you like most people who said to themselves "Looks like a momentum play is in the works, I'll buy now for a quick double and get out before it crashes" Be honest, did you not think this way? Question #10 Those of you with concerns about PRWT, why are you not phoning PanAm daily demanding answers? Question #11 If you are not demanding faxed answers to your questions...when will you? Question #12 If you bought into PRWT because the chance to make a lot of money was there, but it has not come about, why get mad at an alias on a thread. Call the sec, call new Yorks finest, call a lawyer, call your governor, call your priest, call someone that can get something done for you.... But why complain to a thread of people who can't do anything about it. -------------------------------------------------------------- Also, life isn't black and white, it is shades of gray. Yes there are pump and dump crooks Yes there are basher shorts. Most people are neither. They fit in the middle. Price goes up....weee we're going to be rich Price goes down...AHHHH I've been ripped up. look at the CIENNA/Telabs Merger.... Telabs and Cienna were to merge. AT&T was looking at Ciennas Technology The price of Cienna shot to $92 on this great news..... One hour before the merger vote AT&T announced it would not use Ciennas goods. The merger was called off, and the price of CIEN crashed to $8.50 in OCtober So.......was Cien a Scam..... No.... Did those who bought at $92 lose 90% of their money...oh yeah... That is the game. I know people who loaded up on gold in the days when it ran to $800 an ounce. They bought at $700 They should have sold at $800 but NOOOOOOO! it was going to go to $1000 they were SURE of it.... So when it hit $700 it was just a temporary fluctuation, it'll go back up... $600 hmmm, bastard commodity traders playing games. $500 Buying op $400 Germany is shorting gold... $300 I have been robbed by Fort knox. SHEESH! Yeah Yeah, I know, ISOMAN BASHER Canadian shorter evil market making share shaker

To: ColleenB who wrote (24046)	1/24/1999 10:47:00 PM
From: Valkyrie	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 43774

hi colleen...not to be argumentative...as i said...plausible or no, this is what the person i spoke to said to me...as best as i can remember to tell it at this late date...i plainly said that i could not vouch for the accuracy of the information, only the accuracy of my reporting of it, at the time...there is a vast difference... it is quite plausible to me that there was some sort of agreement between the two of them for a transitional period...break in, so to speak...familiarization...i am not saying that this is the case, but it is reasonable to consider the possibility... colleen...there is a man who has made me an offer on my charterboat...if indeed he does buy it from me, it will be my "responsibility" to help familiarize him with it...it will take some of my time to do this...furthermore, i will agree to help him with my client base and make numerous telephone calls at my expense to speak with those clients who have already booked my boat for this upcoming season, about the situation...and, as further clients continue to telephone my house for their reservations, i will relenquish my time, several evenings a week, to deal with it...not for any benefit to me, but to him... none of this is a legal requirement, but it is the right thing for me to do... don