Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : PYNG Technologies -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jack Rayfield who wrote (3198)	1/25/1999 9:16:00 PM
From: Stang	Respond to of 8117

Thanks Andre and Jack for the excellent report. Much appreciated. Stang

To: Jack Rayfield who wrote (3198)	1/25/1999 9:25:00 PM
From: AriKirA	Respond to of 8117

Thank you for the excellent work! Your efforts are greatly appreciated. Kind Regards AK PS: Andre, Jack and Stang By the way Stang, do I have to pay the QST for services rendered? Will you forget about the taxes if I paid you in cash? LOL

To: Jack Rayfield who wrote (3198)	1/25/1999 10:14:00 PM
From: GWD	Respond to of 8117

Hi Jack Thank you Andre and Jack for the indepth report,very much appreciated. What it basically tells me is that Pyng's F.A.S.T.1 will eventually be accepted, and will be a very succesfull product in saving lifes. Having said that,production seems to be way down the road yet,but eventually will get underway.It also seems their original production manager Mr Malcolm Chaddick is no longer with them.Share price probably will remain around $2.50 and $3.00 for a while till some of the items you mentioned will come into play.Overall I am still bullish on the long term future of Pyng,and it is probably a good time to accumulate more shares at this price. regards GWD

To: Jack Rayfield who wrote (3198)	1/26/1999 12:55:00 AM
From: Patrick	Respond to of 8117

Thank you Andre & Jack. Well done!! Patrick

To: Jack Rayfield who wrote (3198)	1/26/1999 10:17:00 AM
From: Edward W. Richmond	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8117

Andre, we are indebted to you for you comprehensive report. Thanks. Regards, Ed

To: Jack Rayfield who wrote (3198)	1/26/1999 11:18:00 PM
From: m. jacobs	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8117

Dear Andre, Thank you for your version of the AGM. I fully understand that after a two hour meeting, without the benefit of a recorder, how you could misunderstand some of the lengthy answers. One thing though that has truly stood out over the last few months is that we have achieved what we set out to do. Conventional I.V. methods have been used for fifty years and the record on the use of this system is clear.It was Pyng Technologies goal to develop a system that could change the statistics on this process and improve upon it to the point that all shock and trauma victims would have a chance for vascular access, which is not the case today with conventional methods.. It takes 3to7 minutes to establish an I.V. in shock and trauma victims and it is 80 percent successful. which means thatI.V. has a 20 percent failure rate. The FAST 1, after over 100 uses in the field is fully capable of providing central line vascular access in 60 seconds and we are achieving a 95 percent success rate when conventional I.V. methods fail. I will be providing a fully detailed news release on the latest reports from the field along with a military update and investor relations and marketing approaches for the near future. Andre,thanks again for your view and I will attempt to provide clear answers to as many of the posed questions as reasonable in the next release as well as provide my view of the AGM. Thanks Michael