Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ProNetLink...PNLK...Click here to enter -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CoffeePot who wrote (8432)	1/25/1999 9:38:00 PM
From: Paganini	Respond to of 40688

Ok so you've stated your opinion. We'll talk toya a little later. Don't call us we'll call you. astalavista babe. cya. bynayahere. totolu. ___ Pag

To: CoffeePot who wrote (8432)	1/25/1999 9:40:00 PM
From: WFHSR	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 40688

Sounds great to me. I'm glad PNLK is getting ATT services. Just makes the company a better product...beats all the rest E trade companies. Wonder why ATT thinks its great PNLK picked them instead of MCI or someone else? Maybe its because this is going to help ATT get in on the ground floor of a new revolutionary international trading system that will be the pace setter for the future. Glad I'm long on PNLK. PS Where is Malko...I'd think he be all over the place today. WFHSR

To: CoffeePot who wrote (8432)	1/25/1999 10:00:00 PM
From: ztect	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 40688

-------More questions in addition to my previous questions--- Mr./Mrs. Coffee Pot: You stated: "....PNLK is purchasing everyday ordinary services from ATT available to ANYONE...plain and simple........." 1. Please define what are "every day ordinary services"? 2. Please also state whether the specific rates offered ie purchased through PNL for these "everyday ordinary services" are greater to, equal to or less than these same exact services can be obtained without using PNL's web site and tools? 3. Are you stating that PNL is purposely trying to deceive investors by using ..."the term"...partnership ..."VERY loosely" ? ======================= Now again my previous questions... 5. Are you stating that PNL (ProNetLink) is willfully trying to deceive investors with its latest press release? Are you somehow trying to infer that PNL isn't a "legit" operation? 6. What is the basis for your conclusions? ie. How do you specifically know what the exact terms are or are not between a stated partnership between AT&T and PNL? Please provide everyone with your links and resources? ====================== Now regarding "your opinion"...... There is a distinct and clear difference between opinion and libel... I can say you are ugly. That may be just an "opinion" However, if I say you are ugly, and you are a model, and my statement adversely effects you're earning potential or dissuades some one, an investor or business, from being interested in you, that is more than opinion, that is libel.. Thus, when you state in, or not in, your opinion..... "Today's news is, in my opinion, a NON-EVENT....what most people think of a partnership and how the word is legally defined can and is creating confusion.....in this case the term is being used VERY loosely...." You are potentially committing libel, especially if you incessantly feel the need to repeat your solitary point, and you are either unwilling or unable to answer the simple questions I've posed to you. Thus I ask you one additional question "Mr/Mrs Pot", Are you purposely trying to dissuade people from purchasing shares in this company by your repetitive posts and unsubstantiated claims? If you are sincere, you would have realized that you have made your point and don't need to repeat it over and over.. Now if you are sincere, and you have nothing else to contribute, I'd suggest you "legally" define the difference between libel and opinion, rather than conjecture on the specific terms of a partnership which you couldn't possibly know. Sincerely, the warden of the Cyberian Gulag, ztect

To: CoffeePot who wrote (8432)	1/25/1999 11:28:00 PM
From: May Tran	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 40688

Hello Coffee Pot, Once and for all, We didn't ask for your expertise here. If you feel like to voice your opinion about the PR this morning, I think you've done that. Then why don't you just do us all here a BIG FAVOR please.. Just move on with your investment and your life. I'm sure your posts do not get any appreciation here. Where were you the last 9 months? How much do you know about this stock and it's alliances?? You just wasting your time and OUR time here And sure enough YOU JUST MAKING A FOOL OUT OF YOURSELF. Gain some respect. Long on PNLK and will be continue to be long ... Johnny PNLK101@aol.com