Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (30055)	1/26/1999 8:44:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 67261

That vast majority of the country has made it clear that they really don't care. That's one interpretation, brees. I'll recycle another interpretation: So on one side we have the physical and ethical gropings of Bill Clinton. But on the other are the hidden tape recorders and pornographic inquiries of Ken Starr. What most people decided this year is that if those are our choices, then Clinton at his most unbuckled and slippery is still less a threat to American values than Starr. They decided that Starr's questions are worse than Clinton's lies. That's a moral judgment too. (http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/time/1998/12/21/right.html) I can't say I don't care, really. James Bowers, who I respect, but who I guarantee doesn't agree much with my personal politics (exept on civil liberties), may or may not care what happens to Clinton, but I'd guess he agrees somewhat with the above sentiments. What most people don't care about, I'd guess, is a bunch of moral reformationists and political hygienists handicapped by a lot of heavy timber in the eye. In a two party system, our choices are limited.