Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: miraje who wrote (30110)	1/27/1999 8:26:00 AM
From: Johannes Pilch	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

>I'm in total agreement with your contention here. Does this mean that you recant your earlier stated position that homosexuality is a choice and not an innate orientation? Just curious.< My position on homosexuality is a bit more complex than this. I do not know of a certainty whether or not it is a choice and neither do you. I am very suspect of the so-called “science” on the matter, since so much of it seems to come from homosexuals themselves. It is perhaps the case homosexuality is an acquired syndrome, perhaps having both environmental and genetic influences. It may be acquired exclusively due to social/environmental factors. Even so, my rejection of it rests upon a philosophical basis, just as does my rejection of cancer, alcoholism and other sicknesses. >On a personal level, if I were faced with a marital decision choosing between a beautiful, intelligent, feminine 25 year old woman with no material assets, and an unattractive, hard core, career fixated 35 year old multi-millionairess, the choice would be easy. Money is not the bait for most guys. It's certainly not for me.< Agreed, though Michelle has cast her bets upon money. She will lose, as I do not recall one love song centered around a man's attraction to a woman's money. Even should she ever marry, she will lose terribly. She has already lost. A pity.

To: miraje who wrote (30110)	1/27/1999 8:38:00 AM
From: lorrie coey	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 67261

Insecure males make many selections and choices based on the desirability of the object, to other males...This includes cars, dogs, hunting gear, pro-sports teams and Women...LOL! Insecure males are in lust with each other's lust...and the constant nagging compulsion to compete for the object...to take it from the other "guy"...having something others don't have...it matters not what the object IS...it could be a chew-toy! Kenstarr has been extremely envious of Clinton all his life...'cause he will never be as secure in his masculinity as the President, or as Alpha!! Hence, the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy to persecute the Clintons. Everything I ever wanted to know about most men, I learned on the playground...the rest is easily grasped at the kennel and don't forget, the primate exhibit at your local Zoo! It's really too bad that you see yourselves as so desirable as to be worthy of being "baited" and caught...it's an LOL moment, again. A drift net works just fine... Of course the "choice" is easy...no insecure male wants a Woman that he cannot quietly or overtly dominate or undermine... "On a personal level, if I were faced with a marital decision choosing between a beautiful, intelligent, feminine 25 year old woman with no material assets, and an unattractive, hard core, career fixated 35 year old multi-millionairess, the choice would be easy. Money is not the bait for most guys. It's certainly not for me." beautiful-unattractive intelligent-hardcore feminine-career fixated Hmm. The 25 yr. old with no assets but the one she sits on is: "beautiful", "intelligent" and best of all "feminine"...read as "helpless" Hmm, again. The 35 yr. old with financial assets, but no NEED to "marry" is: "Unattractive", "hard-core", whatever that means...{my guess is that it means "competent"...but that word would be too threatening and flattering}...and "career fixated"...which implies "successful". Very telling, mister Bowers...you speak well for your contemporaries...