The Fabulous Market Babe:CHECK THIS OUT
Stock of the Day
1/25/99
At Home and America Online / ATHM & AOL
Talk about a competition that no one saw coming...
But hey, that's what makes tech interesting.
Not to mention a great source for trading and investing.
So given all of the recent news surrounding these two, I thought it would be helpful to offer some perspectives as to where the lines on both sides are being drawn, as well as each of the paths going forward.
First off, let's look at the "newbie" on the block, ATHM.
With the XCIT purchase, ATHM will be shifting the XCIT group towards developing proprietary content for ATHM.
Something that, just to point out, is not as easy as its sounds. After all, the goal in developing proprietary content is to capture users and keep them there. As such, ATHM's question becomes the following:
"What are we going to develop that is not already on the 'net?"
Good question.
As such, expect ATHM, and this shouldn't be that much of a surprise, to develop content that takes advantage of its bandwidth, i.e. music and online games.
In addition to the above, it is more than likely that ATHM, concurrent with providing faster access to XCIT's services, develops a plan such that XCIT's services are available to everyone, but priority is given to ATHM's users.
So with the XCIT purchase, ATHM has clearly signaled its path going forward, given it understands the following: A majority of users, post their initial exploratory surfing, go to the portal controlled sites for the bulk of their online activities.
Thus for ATHM, if it has very fast access and some content, users will go thorough ATHM but now stay at its destination due to the news, e-mail features etc., on the site.
As for all of this from AOL's perspective, AOL is very aware that the future lies with fast access. Which, of course, poses a problem for AOL, for as faster access becomes more readily available, this more than likely will cause new users to dump AOL and its dial up service, or just bypass it completely.
Which, incidentally, should explain the small DSL deal that AOL recently is stuck its head into, one which more than likely grow in depth and breadth over time.
As such, it is highly doubtful that AOL/DSL subscribers will see "100 free hours" of DSL access. Plus, users of AOL should expect that AOL's service will more than likely be developed into two tiers -- one with DSL and one without, with the charge for those with DSL getting propped up to around $60/month.
So this one, if anything else, should be interesting to watch given the opposite poles that ATHM and AOL are at, with ATHM having fast access and currently developing content, while AOL possesses content, but is developing its fast access.
Whereby, of course, the next stage for both companies is to converge the two and offer a combination of both.
Something that, incidentally, makes all the sense in the world, given the goal is to provide fast access and then anchor the user to the site, so they will then add additional revenues by viewing ads, spending money, etc.
Otherwise known as the crux of the battle.
So, in wrapping all of this up, some thoughts should be added on ATHM, given this year will be a very crucial one for them.
Here's why.
Last year provided ATHM with the opportunity of getting the word out. As such, the challenge this year is to convert that message into subscribers.
And ATHM needs to do so in a big way.
Specifically, the company needs to more than double its users this year from 300K, i.e. the subscriber number at the end of the year needs to be closer to the 1mm mark rather than the 500K mark.
Which, just to make the point, shouldn't be all that tough to do. After all, if the targeted user views cable TV as a necessity, then faster Internet access will more than likely be viewed also as a necessity.
Plus, on top of all of this, over the next five years, a lot of fiber bandwidth will be coming on line (QWST etc), and as such, ATHM must move quickly to establish high speed access market share.
Yes, this year will be quite an interesting one.
To say the least. |