Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : S3 (A LONGER TERM PERSPECTIVE) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Don Earl who wrote (12653)	1/28/1999 9:35:00 AM
From: stock talk	Respond to of 14577

Looks like they may have hired a new more aggressive PR firm biz.yahoo.com

To: Don Earl who wrote (12653)	1/28/1999 9:44:00 AM
From: stock talk	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14577

Don, I think you hit the nail right on the head: <The way they went from Savage to Savage 4 less than a month after the Intel deal makes me think there may have been a few tricks in some of the Chips and Technology patents that they needed pretty bad. The missed product cycle and the apparent production problems with Savage might have been the result of trying to find an alternate solution to something someone else already knew how to do cheep and easy.> We all know that the costly chip to make, however I think as Ken keeps saying "we are planning to leverage our Intel IP to regain the #1 position leader". Watch how often he uses the word "leverage" with "Intel" in his press releases and speeches. I think he may be giving a clue. That lead me to believe that it may be Intel IP rather than CHPS IP that may increase design advantages and performance and at the same time use a proven manufacturing process, increase performance, lower production cost.