To: 2brasil who wrote (22234 ) 1/29/1999 5:37:00 PM From: Ruffian Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
3G Update> From the February 1, 1999 issue of Wireless Week Europe Requests Proof Of 3G Charges By Caron Carlson WASHINGTON--Responding to challenges regarding the fairness and openness of its standards-setting process, Europe told the United States to put its cards on the table. The European Telecommunications Standards Institute, answering charges from Qualcomm Inc. that the region is shutting out U.S.-developed technology in existing markets and in the anticipated third-generation markets, asked the manufacturer for proof. ETSI "would appreciate documented evidence to indicate where the ETSI standardization process has not been followed by the ETSI Technical Organization (SMG) so that it may be further investigated," ETSI Director General Karl Heinz Rosenbrock, said in a Dec. 17 letter to Qualcomm. The tortured international effort to develop a 3G wireless standard increasingly implicates highest-level trade officials on both sides of the Atlantic. In a recent exchange of letters, the United States rebuked Europe for settling on its own 3G standard before the international effort was concluded, and Europe countered that the United States misunderstood the European activities. Each side has intimated that the other may have violated obligations within the World Trade Organization. From the perspective of the CDMA Development Group, ETSI consistently resists code division multiple access-based proposals. A harmonization initiative introduced by CDG three weeks ago was not openly received by the standards body, according to Perry LaForge, CDG executive director. "Europe seems open, but ETSI seems hell-bent that they're not going to change on anything," he said. According to LaForge, an internal European Union memorandum from EU Telecommunications Commissioner Martin Bangemann to other EU officials in early 1997 clearly demonstrates Europe's intent to block U.S.-developed technology from the region. He said the memo was widely circulated among U.S. policy-makers, but he does not currently have a copy of it. A chronology of technical contributions submitted to ETSI by Qualcomm also shows unfairness in the process, according to William Bold, Qualcomm vice president for government affairs. "A synopsis of the contributions we made is evidence that the proposals made by innovators of CDMA in good faith to improve wideband CDMA were summarily rejected and tabled," he said. ETSI's voting structure also is under attack. Qualcomm maintains that voting is weighed by the level of sales a company has in Europe, limiting the influence of U.S. manufacturers. Proponents of the rival technology, including Ericsson Inc., appear undaunted by the solicitation of hard evidence showing European resistance to Qualcomm's technology. Ericsson drafted a letter to U.S. officials supporting the process as "an excellent opportunity to bring forth documented evidence relating to concerns that have been raised by U.S. government officials."