SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Delsecur or Grandeur (GDER-OTCBB) DEL-ID for Ecommerce -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: kbert who wrote (322)1/30/1999 9:27:00 PM
From: David  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 384
 
I'd say that GDER and DDSI are in a class by themselves as biometrics nonentities, but that is a bit beside the point I want to make here.

Posting that false finger detection technology is nothing new is not bashing. It is simply providing useful and relevant information. If you think that post was bashing, what does that tell you about GDER's prospects?



To: kbert who wrote (322)1/31/1999 1:45:00 PM
From: Rob S.  Respond to of 384
 
Thanks for the warning. The trouble with many advocates for one stock or the other is that they work from the premise that a company must have something that is totally revolutionary in order to be a success. Nothing could be further from the truth. What they teach you in business school (MBA program) is that THE most common and important ingredient in formulating a successful start-up business is getting into a high growth industry during the early stages. Another fallacy is that competition for new product ventures is always bad. In fact, having competition when breaking ground with new technologies or product concepts (i.e. public acceptance of biometric identification) is more often a positive thing because it helps to expand awareness and acceptance: psychologists have concluded that people more easily accept new things into their lives when they have a CHOICE between more than one supplier. That is a major reason why the IBM style PC has gained widespread acceptance even though it has been criticized as often being "engineered by committee" compared to a more tightly controlled system such as Apple's.