SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Silicon Valley Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: FJB who wrote (1943)1/31/1999 10:40:00 AM
From: orkrious  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2946
 
Bob, do you know why SVGI plans on using a Lambda Physik laser?

Lambda Physik's 157 nm F2 laser is the planned light source.

news.semiconductoronline.com
Jay



To: FJB who wrote (1943)2/1/1999 12:09:00 PM
From: Artslaw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2946
 
Did you read the papers on gate oxides presented at IEDM?

Bob,

I was at IEDM and attended the session where IBM made their statement (my Ph.D. thesis included research on oxide reliability, so this is right up my alley). Oxide reliability is a big deal, and it has always been a big deal. However, along with my friends from a variety of companies, we found IBM's results to be Chicken Littlesque. On the other hand, IBM certainly knows how to get good free press!

How thick would the gate oxide be on a 0.07 process?

Well, you really can't go below a mono-layer, so I'd have to say thicker than 5Å. Then again, maybe you use Si3N4 or an even higher-epsilon insulator which lets you go thicker for the same 'bang', or perhaps you find a way to operate below 1V with low-threshold transistors (with some way to reduce the subthreshold/standby current).

On another related note, people often forget that just because you can resolve down to 0.08 microns (or smaller), it doesn't necessarily mean you can make a decent transistor. There is an art to process engineering--it's not just a shrink of the last design.

Steve