Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Edwarda who wrote (29598)	1/31/1999 10:42:00 AM
From: Graystone	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 108807

What collective ? or Dialectics You seem fairly intelligent. BergBrain doesn't believe in the collective. He has rights that don't depend upon force. He is bulletproof. He also thinks that other people like him make up armies, everyone knows armies are made of soldiers. Your examples are perfectly valid, if you assume the collective exists and each man influenced it to achieve change in the world. Euclid made great leaps, but he did so within an established paradigm. The acceptance of his work by others made him a force, not the rightness of his contributions. Compare Euclid with Aristotle. BergBrain doesn't accept any of your arguments, he can't, you acknowledge reality, he doesn't, after all, he has certain rights which are bulletproof and he supports those rights with force. BergBrain is like Aristotle. His claims are as worthless as his bulletproof rights.