Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : FRANKLIN TELECOM (FTEL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JHP who wrote (40545)	1/31/1999 1:50:00 PM
From: golfinggramps	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 41046

JHP: Just curious. You sure to seem spend a lot of time and energy vehmently attacking FTEL and anyone that disagrees with you. IMO, you have very little chance to change the minds of FTEL investors or gain any sense of respect from the FTEL board. Sure seems there is an ulterior motive, shorting, personal vendetta against the company or maybe You just don't like anybody. Please fill me in. Thank You, Jim

To: JHP who wrote (40545)	1/31/1999 3:35:00 PM
From: mark garner	Respond to of 41046

u r a crummy basher and big fool. if u read USAT's press releases, u will see that they recieved 8 million in financing. FTEL already has the 2.5 million dollars in the bank. verified by the company. "your opinion" -- prefixing your statements with that phrase doesnt preclude you from libel...especially with easily verifiable facts. u r on thin ice little boy. so, LITTLE BOY, go back to your pathetic little world. its funny how COWARDS LIKE YOU only appear when there is some controversy.

To: JHP who wrote (40545)	1/31/1999 6:41:00 PM
From: VALUESPEC	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 41046

<<Hopefully the SEC has ftel next on it's hit parade. . .>> I wonder if the management is concerned about that. After all, with FTEL's past, will that make them a more likely target of a SEC probe? The SEC has scarce resources. I suspect you've got to be pretty bad for them to DOCUMENT what is going on. Previously sued by ATT . . . Franks timely sales (around $ 10). . . The failed Intrine order . . . The recent bad news with USAT. . . What next? VALUESPEC valuespec.com

To: JHP who wrote (40545)	1/31/1999 9:35:00 PM
From: Ward W. Ward	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 41046

JHP: I want you to know that I have sent your words to Franklin Telecommunications. I'm sure that they will be interested in holding you accountable for such accusations. Frank Peters, President of Franklin Telecom has gone on record saying: "We will prosecute, to the full extent of the law, anybody attempting to injure our company through slander, libel or manipulation of the market in such a way as to prevent the free and natural trading of our stock-especially when this might result in damage to our shareholders." www2.techstocks.com I talked to Mr. Peters face to face last week on this very issue and you should be warned, he's not kidding. The courts are beginning to hold people like you accountable for what you say. And don't think that the so called anonymity of JHP is any protection. They have ways to know everything they need to know about you. SI's policy on personal privacy won't mean squat.