SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : PERFUMANIA.COM . . PRFM . . .FOR LONGS ONLY -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rande Is who wrote (1523)2/1/1999 9:42:00 AM
From: David Helms  Respond to of 2489
 
200,000 traded in first 10min....

Can anyone say alka seltzer, alka seltzer, alka seltzer......

:-}

dave!



To: Rande Is who wrote (1523)2/1/1999 9:44:00 AM
From: Kevin Podsiadlik  Respond to of 2489
 
Down 1 3/4... you have a strange definition of a short squeeze...



To: Rande Is who wrote (1523)2/1/1999 9:55:00 AM
From: Nathan G  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2489
 
Man! I don't care if this stock is going up or down. Won't touch a stock that trades dirty.In at 6 7/8 out at 10 3/4.

Hey, the trading is turning normal again with an upward bias.

Good luck to all the longs.



To: Rande Is who wrote (1523)2/1/1999 3:00:00 PM
From: Anthony@Pacific  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 2489
 
Rande ..I would say you have some serious liability ..by the way,... froma regulatory standpoint had you been licensed you would have fired, fined, and sued..

Primarily because you had absolutely no basis for your outrageous claims and your comments are truly disturbing and to the poor folks who bought at 13 or 14 on your pick and baseless recommendation,, I think they can be very successful at recouping damages from you..especially since you were all given new info and y76ou still told everybody that they should ignore all the facts and buy it because of media hype and CNBC plugs..What a load of BS..

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Looks like you have no idea how the market works because what you see as being explosive is always the top.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

I still get a kick out of this post..not sure if you were just hyped yourself or you couldnt get the BS out fast enough...

To: rogermci (1522 )
From: Rande Is Monday, Feb 1 1999 9:40AM ET
Reply # of 1652

SHORT SQUEEZE happening now. . .this is wild. I said it would be volatile this thing could is explosive