Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : PERFUMANIA.COM . . PRFM . . .FOR LONGS ONLY -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Anthony@Pacific who wrote (1655)	2/1/1999 3:18:00 PM
From: Sean Rieber	Respond to of 2489

Anthony, do everyone a favor and shutup. I don't know Rande or care what his purpose here is. But, based on what he said, PRFM could have easily skyrocketed. They just poorly timed the PR and the resignation hurt them. The fact is I bought AMEN at 5 a while back. It went to 12 and when mentioned on CNBC it immediately skyrocketed to 19. It opened the next day at 39 only to retreat back to 17. Anyone who bought at 13 or 14 took a risk. They knew it when they placed the order. This stock could have very well shot to 20. It should have if you compare every other company that launched a website. I assume Rande was going by past performances and had the best intentions at heart. Sure, I am one of the lucky ones who got in at 3 11/16. I do feel bad for those who bought at 13 but if they choose to blame Rande for their losses then no, I don't sympathize with them. They should learn to do their own research. This thread is to open their eyes to a stock and to read up on research done by others and post their own. It is not to buy and sell on the hype of others. That is just plain stupid and those people should take their money and put it into mutual funds if they want others to make their money for them. That is the problem with America today. Nobody wants to own up to their own mistakes and they are always looking for a scapegoat. Anthony, you are no better. I have read all the posts and Rande did nothing wrong. He is not licensed, he is merely an average trader just like all of us who posted what he thought to be an opportunity to make money. Anybody who thinks differently is just plain stupid. Sorry for the long post folks, I just can't tolerate ignorance anymore.

To: Anthony@Pacific who wrote (1655)	2/1/1999 3:18:00 PM
From: Rande Is	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 2489

FASCINATING. had you been licensed you would have fired, fined, and sued.. You certainly are an experienced trader, that is for certain. So well organized, too. Someone earlier had suggested I do a full-text search on word, elgindy. FASCINATING. Rande Is PS> Message 7595010 Reply 1616