Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (31435)	2/1/1999 2:20:00 PM
From: Les H	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Julie Steele originally confirmed Willey's story to Newsweek. Clinton's affidavits haven't worth the paper they're written on.

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (31435)	2/1/1999 2:41:00 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

<<Starr is totally correct in putting the screws on Julie Steele to support the "true" version of the many Kathleen Willey stories floating around out there.>> Dan??? I know you have the "version" that you hope holds water the best, but why are you so totally closed to the idea that some people may have hidden or protected information on the case. Do you not want to know or are you convinced that Star is just out to hurt innocent people and manufacture facts? Personally I don't see a problem with putting pressure on people who's stories don't wash. Its not like this thing is going to rest after the Senate is through with it. It would be nice if we could take every opportunity to get it right the first time. I don't want to see Oliver Stone and everyone else making this generation look stupid for refusing to investigate properly and look at all the facts.