Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : FRANKLIN TELECOM (FTEL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jamey who wrote (40612)	2/2/1999 1:40:00 PM
From: nmk	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 41046

Did you know you were reposted at Raging Bull? It's funny, I took your questions to be genuine concerns, but when I saw that the gentleman who reposted you (who has quite a reputation) was associating himself with your post, I read your post differently... Guilt by association...I did the same thing to you as you did to FTEL in this message. Odd isn't it?

To: Jamey who wrote (40612)	2/2/1999 5:04:00 PM
From: mark garner	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 41046

that has got to be one of the most ludicrous posts i have read, other than JHP's. do u even have an CLUE as to what you are talking about? u are comparing apples to potatoes! your analysis isnt even close. let me give u one clue...USAT had a "supposed" agreement to a buyout/merge with Trendmark. Trendmark was marketing USAT's flat rate service. Trendmark distributor's did something concening the marketing of USAT's flat rate service that USAT's management (and the SEC) did not agree with. when USAT's mgmt discovered this, it looks like they severed ties with Trendmark, as far as having Trendmark market their service. what in god's name does this have to do with 1) Franklin 2) Franklin's prior 800 service problem with the company that had scammed AT&T Your analogy is WAY OFF BASE. either u are trying to mislead, or u r VERY IGNORANT. maybe u can explain to the rest of us how u reached your conclusion that there is some tie here...i need a good laugh.