Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Concurrent Computer (CCUR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nimbus who wrote (6807)	2/3/1999 8:25:00 AM
From: Don Hand	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 21142

Since SEAC is NT then it makes sense that it is compliant. As an end product I do not think it is that important for CCUR to conform. Their back office billing system on the other hand should. It looks like the NT boys are waiting for the next release of NT. SEAC actually should fear Microsoft because it is at their mercy. They could launch their own solution and kill it. UNIX should be ready to go. And since the imbedded business is picking up CCUR can confirm their plan to continue on the strenght of UNIX . And the Sun and Oracle solution looks more complicated to operate then CCUR's . CCUR and SFA both get that 6 month lead.

To: Nimbus who wrote (6807)	2/3/1999 9:50:00 AM
From: Christiaan McDonald	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 21142

CCUR signs a deal with Intertainer. Intertainer says CCUR's server is the best. SEAC signs a deal with someone else and they say SEAC's server is the only one compliant. SO WHAT!!!!!!! Do you really think Intertainer is going to sign a deal with CCUR and say otherwise. Do you really think SEAC is going to sign a deal with someone and the other party not say something nice about SEAC server? SALES TALK. NOTHING ELSE. ALWAYS TO BE TAKEN WITH A GRAIN OF SALT. Ken