Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

SI - Site Forums : Silicon Investor - Welcome New SI Members! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Ulrich who wrote (4317)	2/4/1999 4:49:00 PM
From: Green Receipt	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 32871

again i gave the schwab as a pure example but not related directly to this case at all. I only mentioned it to give you a scope of what could be done if one wanted to be subversive. all i was really trying to say was this: 1) People went to his profile. They thought they were at si. In reality they were at a page that looked identical on his company site. 2) Cheeky could have kept the IP and used to gain access to their computer via a automated robot program or whatever. whether he did or not is his knowledge not ours as we don't have access to the source code at his site. there are many things that can be done, even the famous teardrop. I've seen the source code and know how it works. the point is basically not to make a hoax si site. If you are going to make one, at least put something in big letters that says something to the effect "this is not the official SI site". I don't know why ck and cheeky have been feuding or how long but to me just seeing cheeky's many responses to ck's few tells me that cheeky is winning the war by yelling louder. That doesn't make him right. Like i say I don't know whats going on but judging on what ck has told me I think she has a right to wonder why he is bugging her.