Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (32309)	2/5/1999 12:09:00 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Neocom, The issue has always been Lying, coverups, abuse of office and obstruction with bill clinton. It has never been just his private sexual affair as his defenders continually spin you and others away from the issue. Of course, I can see that the sex aspect of the two cases is no comparison. My point in bringing up the Jean Benet Ramsey case is to ask them to reconsider there just some bodies private sex. I am the first and always have been in the front of saying the only thing that matters to me is that, I do not accept bill clinton as a representative of the people because we can not trust him. The American people, and people in general are very forgiving. The circumstances for forgiveness involve the persons recognition of wrong doing, the intention to change, and the desire for forgiveness. Given all the stuff I believe bill clinton to be covering and all the continuing obstruction and lying; He doesn't qualify. If you want to join in with his defenders and focus on excusing him for his sexual deviancy go ahead. Forget about truth and justice as an important issue. BC's sex is not my issue and never has been. When any of them are ready to debate the issue of lying and obstruction of justice on its own merits I am ready. I am sick of hearing the leave him alone with his private affairs bs.