Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : 3DFX -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Michael G. Potter who wrote (10526)	2/5/1999 3:24:00 PM
From: Sun Tzu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 16960

What was repriced and how? Could you give us some detail. TIA ST

To: Michael G. Potter who wrote (10526)	2/5/1999 4:39:00 PM
From: Patrick Grinsell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 16960

Potter, quit reading my mind! I have less trouble with the general employee repricing (although being late on Banshee was an issue). I do tend to get a little steamed when the executives reprice. I feel the general employess have executed well and deserve a repricing. Banshee was late because Ballard decided not to work on Voodoo2 and Banshee in parallel. That said, there is no incentive to be accountable to the shareholders if the execs just reprice their options every time. If anything I want stock price tied EVEN MORE to the execs salary. In my mind, it looks like they gave themselves a raise without adding shareholder value. Actually, shareholder value declined. I hope somebody nails them at the shareholders meeting on this. It pisses me off. Pat