SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Knighty Tin who wrote (45900)2/5/1999 4:12:00 PM
From: Ed Beers  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 132070
 
MB,

Cyrix currently sells into a price slot below Intel and
AMD. I'm sure that the price war between AMD and Intel
will squeeze them hard. I would be wary of making conclusions
on box sales based on their results.

Ed



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (45900)2/5/1999 4:29:00 PM
From: Timothy Liu  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 132070
 
I never knew Cyrix is setting industry trend.

Oh BTW, what was Cyrix latest processor?

Tim



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (45900)2/5/1999 6:49:00 PM
From: yard_man  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 132070
 
>> Whether the strength of the analog and wireless segment will be
enough to offset weaker microprocessor sales is still uncertain, said
James R. Foltz, director of financial relations. However, Foltz said it
may create an upside for earnings because the analog and wireless
business generates higher-margin products. <<

No way, mpcs is a business with guaranteed high margins. I feel the breath of an INTC devotee ...

(AR -- like I was saying about AMD -- typically these comm chips have been higher margin for the also ran mpcs cos)