Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PanAmerican BanCorp (PABN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Valkyrie who wrote (25259)	2/5/1999 6:06:00 PM
From: ColleenB	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 43774

.lets assume the company has shares that they can sell now...nobody in their right mind, in that position, would be selling them now...they do have a certain amount of control...i.e. they can release something to make the price go up, even a little, and then sell for more. well, technically speaking donald, the "company" is not selling shares, rather the possibility that it is an "insider", or a person(s) with a large number of shares. And well, let's see, John and partners have been reported as having purchased 400 MILLION shares for .001 cents (an older yahoo post) and it too has been reported that Gus (the original CEO of purewater) had at one time 100 MILLION (to which he has admitted to posters that he sold some into the July rally)... so, we know that at least one person has admitted to having sold into our buying frenzies. sooooo... let's go by your idea and see what we come up with... let's just say 8 MILLION shares were "dumped" at 1.8 cents, this would net a person, $144K dollars, and this said person might have paid...$8K dollars for this same amount of shares. This would net the person with a PROFIT of $136,000 not too shabby. Of course, we don't know for a fact that this transaction may have taken place. Darn those missing financials

To: Valkyrie who wrote (25259)	2/5/1999 6:08:00 PM
From: ERRAFF	Respond to of 43774

Thank you Donald! Actualy the smarter move would to have sold at 3 or 4, just a thought!

To: Valkyrie who wrote (25259)	2/5/1999 8:56:00 PM
From: Scottoo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 43774

Well, when one considers, Donald, the qui tam aspect of the ultra vires filing, you must address the quid pro quo and that which jhild ipse dixit, then it follows inter alia ipissima verba et ipso jure, jacta est alea et loco citato. Nonne? Mens legis?. Paucis verbis___jhild, et una voce(in a few words, jhild,and in one voice) you are an-----A-- hole Sorry, it's a thing between jhild and me. Tell me beforehand sweets, if your reply will take more than two pit stops. And the sheep continue to gambol Warm Regards, Scottoo