Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (32461)	2/6/1999 11:29:00 AM
From: Bob Lao-Tse	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

...was the Arkansas troopers story that Smith set up Brock with true or false? It's totally irrelevant, but it does serve your purpose of adding to the murk. Regardless of every other consideration, Bill Clinton swore an oath to tell "the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth," and then, entirely of his own free will, violated that oath. You continue to maintain that there was some sort of conspiracy to "get" Clinton. While this may very well be true, it has absolutely no bearing on the situation at hand. If Clinton had not perjured himself, none of this could have happened, no matter how badly the conspirators might have wanted it to. He did it entirely on his own. Your continuing references to this conspiracy imply that the conspirators somehow are to blame for Clinton's situation. The only way that this could be so would be if they coerced him into committing a crime. Neocon brought up entrapment because that's what you've been implying all along. Or were you just adding to the murk? -BLT