SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Yousef who wrote (48819)2/6/1999 1:10:00 PM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571635
 
Re: "Without FET's with high drive currents (940ua/um N, 420ua/um P), Low K dielectrics, ... AMD doesn't stand a chance at keeping up in the
"Mhz race" (tm Yousef)."

Not with their current architecture I agree, however AMDs arguement is that with deeper pipelines - read: fewer gates between flops, they can achieve higher frequencies because of shorter delays between stages. My question is that if this is true shouldn't we see the other devices using this technique enjoying the same benifits? Why does IBM need copper to still fall behind Intel in the mhz race? They use RISC design techniques. So does SPARC and they're lower frequency as well. Why? Alpha seems to be the only one who can ship in limited quantities with high frequencies but their new 21264 that is just beginning to limp out the door is at 500mhz.

EP



To: Yousef who wrote (48819)2/6/1999 1:11:00 PM
From: Scumbria  Respond to of 1571635
 
Yousef,

Neither of these processes will be able to support a 700mhz "screaming core" or 200mhz memory.

Once again, you are not considering the impact of architecture on clock speed. Can the 0.35u process which the 21164 is built on support 700 Mhz?

If K7 is already running over 500 Mhz, it would not be a bit surprising if some speed work brought it up to 700 Mhz. In fact, it would it would be extremely surprising if it couldn't hit 700 Mhz in the current process.

Scumbria



To: Yousef who wrote (48819)2/6/1999 7:20:00 PM
From: Kevin K. Spurway  Respond to of 1571635
 
Re: "Please see my earlier post for technical details -->"

I ckecked some of your earlier posts and I noticed you thought AMD would never make it to 350 MHz.

exchange2000.com

Guess nobody should be relying on you for predictions.

Kevin