Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (32593)	2/7/1999 4:11:00 AM
From: DD™	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

* SEN. BYRD(D): KLINTOONS CRIMES WARRANT REMOVAL FROM OFFICE * Excerpt.. "It will be very difficult to stand and say 'not guilty,' very difficult," says Byrd, who just two weeks ago sought to dismiss the second presidential impeachment trial in U.S. history rather than have to cast that vote. "Who is kidding who here? I have to live with myself. I have to live with my conscience, and I have to live with the Constitution. That Constitution is just like the Bible. You can't write it over," he adds. freerepublic.com DD

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (32593)	2/8/1999 1:29:00 AM
From: Neocon	Respond to of 67261

Your attempts to bait me on this are pointless and tiresome. I will say, though, that my feelings are not much different than what I described earlier about my reaction to Clinton during the '92 primaries, except in confirming further my impression of him as being unbelievably smarmy. This, you may note, was before he supposedly coopted us. Further, like many neoconservatives, and despite my support of Reagan and increasing conservatism during the '80s, I found it difficult to become a Republican, and dawdled about changing my registration for some time, hoping that groups like the DLC would prove viable. In fact, a lot of neocons were talked into endorsing Clinton, and then (predictably) got screwed. I was too small a fish to get wooed, but an acquaintance of mine was practically promised an important post at State that he would have been perfect for, and then discovered he had been had. I partly switched parties because of Clinton. He was supposed to represent our best hope for a centrist Democratic Party, but I found him an intolerable lightweight, and stuck with Bush.