Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Earlie who wrote (45989)	2/7/1999 7:50:00 AM
From: accountclosed	Respond to of 132070

Message 7699150

To: Earlie who wrote (45989)	2/7/1999 12:19:00 PM
From: Mary Cluney	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 132070

Earlie,>>>Drop me a private email, and I will so provide.<<< Thanks, but no thanks. I guess here is another case on where we disagree on definitions eg "without hesitation". >>> By the way, Intel's engineers will tell you this without hesitation.<<< Mary

To: Earlie who wrote (45989)	2/7/1999 2:33:00 PM
From: Mike M2	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 132070

Earlie, if the tough love fer techstocks doesn't come this year we may have to call you NEVER -g- . I received the latest Hickey yesterday - he suggests MU may turn a profit this Q . IMO if this happens the bulls will initiate a savage assault on the few remaining shorts and wildly optimistic earnings projections will be issued on a steady basis and CNBC will be sure to tell the public about each and every bullish forecast several times a day -g- ( as noted this is my opinion not fred hickey's ). Fred Hickey also mentions the possiblity of a stock split - i was thinking the same thing because it is one of the few new tricks left to play. Mike