Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ZuluGroup.com (ZULU/ESVS)-Ecommerce & Internet Advertising -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CWIII who wrote (888)	2/8/1999 2:30:00 AM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2003

Cliff, this is a company that is forming many different components. Zulu-tek has always been a holding company, i.e., several subsidiaries. Has everything that is happening been announced? I doubt it. Will everything eventually be announced? Most likely. If you're building something as big as the state of Texas, why let the competition in on it? Could corporate espionage and opposition research create the likes of the Neghead contingent we so often see posting negatively on a daily basis? Perhaps. How come? Go to your SI search engines. Click "Discussion" and then click "text." Once you've got your SI search for phrases, words and text ready, type in "Zulu scam" or "Zulu ripoff" or "Zulu fraud" or any word you wish. What you'll find is that there is no downside of Zulu that is at all discussed within and among participants from other SI threads. It's a one-sided bash only on SI/Zulu and Yahoo/ESVS threads. So this tells us that the Neghead contingent is only here and nowhere else. Were Zulu as bad as the Negheads say it is, we would pick up on this from converstation on other threads, particularly ones with like-minded tv/internet-type technology. When I was suspended from SI for three days, I spent my suspension time researching this. It's not there folks! The negative is only here. And it's a spin-off of Wired and the copycat SD. Were ex-SIMers well-connected into Wired? Well, you think about it. Afterall, SIM was once market leader to Doubleclick! It's only Jon Tara, HIGHPLANESDRIFTER, Random, Kayak, Tradescape, ZuluGate, several others who change their screen names a lot and, yes, Aleta, who primarily do the neg-heaping. Prior to them there was Tokyo Mex and that whole run-up and down, pump and dump contingent, Other Chap among them. Go figure! My conclusion is: Look to the quality of what you see only. Compare this with only substantiated and qualified information that is available from both SEC, company and trade journal sources. And as a backdrop, consider that the executive leadership of SIM, itself, wanted to do what Zulu-tek is now doing, and the inherent disgruntlement which results from this in a highly competitive and cutthroat advertising industry. Then factor in whose edging who out for ecommerce. Also factor in, what is described above is a derivative of my own sense of strategy and my attempt to discover an answer to the craziness I've witnessed over this past year. When you do this--as I have done--then I think you begin to see not only a pattern, but a clear picture of what's going on.