SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neocon who wrote (32688)2/8/1999 2:41:00 AM
From: Jack Be Quick  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
<<He mentioned it on his show, and I have no reason to think he lied.>>

Well, if you heard it on TV, that's different.

<<Why can't you accept that some people find Clinton's problems with integrity a bit much?>>

Do they? Do you really think so? Which people: The ones who accuse him of single-handedly destroying Western civilization? The ones who accuse him of murdering dozens of potential witnesses? The ones who accuse him of violently raping dozens of women? The ones, like you, who seem to me to like "a bit" of everything, but not too much? Or, and this is the one I really like the very best, the ones who accuse him of poisoning race relations in this country? No, do you really think some people find Clinton's problems with integrity a bit much? Please, tell me more about this astonishing state of affairs.



To: Neocon who wrote (32688)2/8/1999 8:34:00 AM
From: jlallen  Respond to of 67261
 
Maybe he does not understand the concept of integrity? JLA



To: Neocon who wrote (32688)2/8/1999 2:02:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 67261
 
By the way, your amateur psycho-analysis of Matthews was silly. Why can't you accept that some people find Clinton's problems with integrity a bit much?

You havent paid attention to this dialogue. Matthews has sucked up to the lamest republican conservatives on the planet. (Quayle and Ralph Reed). Tell me what that has to do with his demeanor of a "liberal guy that has a problem with Clintons integrity". Answer: nothing. He changed his stripes, which is fine, a lot of people do, but dont present yourself as something you are not and quit trying to represent the bay area with your embrace to the hated Christian Coalition, Chris..