SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : AT&T -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: trouthead who wrote (1928)2/9/1999 9:20:00 PM
From: porcupine --''''>  Respond to of 4298
 
Moody's Investors Service has downgraded its long term ratings
on the debt and preferred stock of AT&T CORP (senior unsecured to
A1 from Aa3), has assigned a (P)A1 rating to AT&T's recently filed
shelf registration and has upgraded the debt and preferred stock
of Tele-Communications Inc. (TCI) and its subsidiaries (senior
unsecured to A2 from Baa3). The rating actions conclude a review
initiated on June 26, 1998 following the announcement of a
proposed acquisition of TCI by AT&T in an exchange of common stock
which is expected to close in the near future. AT&T's Prime-1
short term rating was not on review and is confirmed. The outlook
for the revised ratings is stable. (Reuters)




To: trouthead who wrote (1928)2/9/1999 10:14:00 PM
From: lml  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4298
 
But "service" is more than just the speed of the pipes it is the number of services and options you can access with those pipes.

What kind of "services & options" did you have in mind?

i also can't imagine that T would be forced to open without some form of compensation.

Of course. But I wouldn't necessarily expect such compensation to be just. Why? Because the market value of such access would be difficult determine (i.e. placing a market cap on the dot-coms). A more likely approach might be based cost. Specifically, a court might require that T be reimbursed the pro rata share of the expected return on it's investment for the portion of access it would be providing. Bottom line is that any access T would be compelled to provide would likely not be offered at "arms-length." The price would be artificial -- & likely to the other party's benefit.

Oh, BTW, check out biz.yahoo.com