Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : SFLK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GemSeeker who wrote (483)	2/9/1999 4:24:00 PM
From: KHS	Respond to of 1591

On the surface they did nothing different than Intel did in December when Intel announced they would exceed estimates. On the surface is all I know. If anybody has more facts let us know, otherwise state it as an opinion. thank you.

To: GemSeeker who wrote (483)	2/9/1999 6:57:00 PM
From: Eric Fader	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1591

BAAAAAD analogy G.S. Astoundingly bad, in fact. If I remember correctly, GRNO put out vague releases describing supposed contracts with companies that no one had ever heard of, with no substance apparent behind the announcements. The company's failure ever to produce anything substantive certainly validated the SEC's action. It was pretty much the same thing with Solucorp (SLUP) and any number of other halted stocks like OMGD, OVIS/RMIL, and of course SEXI. SOFTLINK IS DIFFERENT. SFLK has products that people have seen, touched and used, and verifiable agreements with legitimate entities. Unfortunately, they also have a PR firm with the brazen "we can get away with it" mentality of Saddam Hussein invading Kuwait. I hope management of SFLK is smart enough, and has enough belief in the company's own products and prospects, to have told International Buying Power that promotion is nice, but out-of-control hype ("WATCH FOR OUR GREAT PRESS RELEASE COMING OUT TOMORROW!") is to be avoided if the company is to be taken seriously.