Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (33174)	2/10/1999 1:11:00 AM
From: iandiareii	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

Neocon-- While I take your larger point -- the VRWC doesn't reach this far -- the idea that a "Leftist" has anything to lose by torpedoing Sid Blumenthal stretches credulity. Chris Hitchens should be taken at his word, I think, but his writing makes clear that he feels justified in disliking both Clinton and his partisans. As a sidebar, Hitchens and fellow Brit Alexander Cockburn have recently been going back-and-forth on whether Orwell's list of suspect persons (submitted, in part, to British intelligence) should bar George forever from the ranks of the righteous. Hitchens applauds Orwell's naming names as a legitimate continuation of his hard-earned anti-Stalinism. Lest we forget, Hitchens also writes for the Maoist (or is it Trotskyite) "Vanity Fair," so perhaps anything is possible. VLWC, anyone? ian

To: Neocon who wrote (33174)	2/10/1999 8:13:00 AM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

hahahahahaha Warned you, didn't I? JLA