Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Rande Is . . . HOME -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: scrooge who wrote (3155)	2/10/1999 9:00:00 AM
From: coug	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 57584

Richard, This is my first post on this thread but I have checked it now and then since I found the link.. I consider it "A LONG THREAD", along with Trader J's and the Tmex's..I consider Anthony's a "SHORT THREAD" .. I see animosity between threads. I see accusations of conspiacies of shorts and longs and longs and shorts.. I guess what I don't understand there is no right or wrong on either.. or it is aLL WRONG on both sides to HYPE or DISCREDIT a stock in a organized manner.. IMO, I would guess more people have lost money and have been Hurt by HYPSTERS in the last 10 years thatn shorters because it is more natural tendency to BUY anything.. and hope it appreciates.. Because we as a people, are hyped into buying all the time.. Autos to vacuum cleaners.. IT IS FOREIGN to a person to first SELL something and then have to buy it back.. So IMO shorters have brought some sanity to an otherwise over priced market.. Personally, I have no bone to pick with either side but IMO, If a person is a TRADER, They have to look TO BOTH SIDES.. Some Reading to those that are not familar is EDWIN LEFERE's (aka Jesse Livermore?) "Reminiscences of a Stock Operator".. A 1900-1935 account of a trader.. Just some thoughts and Good luck all.. the Coug