SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : XOMA. Bull or Bear? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Robert S. who wrote (8688)2/12/1999 12:36:00 AM
From: Tharos  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 17367
 
If orally administered antibiotics are well absorbed, have excellent bioavailability, and provide blood and tissue levels that are virtually the same as those attained by intravenous administration, then there is no difference therapeutically between oral and intravenous antibiotics. . . . Antibiotics that are equally efficacious when administered intravenously or orally (table 3) include doxycycline (Doryx, Vibramycin, Vibra-Tabs), metronidazole (Flagyl, Protostat), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) (Bactrim, Cotrim, Septra), clindamycin hydrochloride (Cleocin), minocycline, and the oral quinolones (eg, levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin).

Gee, I was expecting to see Neuprex in the list, but notice it is not. Any comment as to why you think rBPI will not be used because it is only available intravenously? Got some hot news on the pill form of Neuprex?

Agents used in empirical intravenous-to-oral switch therapy at Winthrop-University Hospital, Mineola, New York
Infection: Acute bacterial meningitis
Intravenous agent*: Ceftriaxone sodium
Oral agent*: Chloramphenicol


I again fail to see rBPI. I would spend more time on this, such as comment on the effectiveness of either compound vs. Neuprex, but as Dilbert points out, never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.

And it would seem you have too much experience.



To: Robert S. who wrote (8688)2/12/1999 12:48:00 AM
From: aknahow  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 17367
 
Welcome back Robert S! where have you been. There have been 87 bullish post since your last visit. Thought we had agreed that you would make one of your standard negative post for each two bullish ones.



To: Robert S. who wrote (8688)2/12/1999 7:16:00 PM
From: Cacaito  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 17367
 
Robert S. Bpi will be very expensive and all insurances are going to pay for it.

Septic shock and oral treatment? just not viable.